andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2008-11-21 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
Why is a study that looked at only 20 children getting national media coverage? Such a small sample is hardly the best scientific methodology.

Date: 2008-11-21 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
The percentages don't matter what matters is the standard error. Even still the statistics used on such a small sample won't be all that powerful do there is some reason to doubt the significance of any statistical significances found.

Date: 2008-11-21 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
(20 is a decent number for a pilot study though)

Date: 2008-11-21 10:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 0olong.livejournal.com
...because the national media cares much more about the human interest value of 'science' stories than it does their credibility in scientific terms?

November 2025

S M T W T F S
       1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Nov. 2nd, 2025 06:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios