andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2008-11-21 03:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meihua.livejournal.com
Am I the only one who read this as "a direction has begun acting in an erroneous manner and is affecting a child"?

Date: 2008-11-21 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
Why is a study that looked at only 20 children getting national media coverage? Such a small sample is hardly the best scientific methodology.

Date: 2008-11-21 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
The percentages don't matter what matters is the standard error. Even still the statistics used on such a small sample won't be all that powerful do there is some reason to doubt the significance of any statistical significances found.

Date: 2008-11-21 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
(20 is a decent number for a pilot study though)

Date: 2008-11-21 10:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 0olong.livejournal.com
...because the national media cares much more about the human interest value of 'science' stories than it does their credibility in scientific terms?

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 12th, 2025 11:26 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios