andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2008-11-21 03:30 pm
Entry tags:

Delicious LiveJournal Links for 11-21-2008

[identity profile] meihua.livejournal.com 2008-11-21 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Am I the only one who read this as "a direction has begun acting in an erroneous manner and is affecting a child"?

[identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com 2008-11-21 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Why is a study that looked at only 20 children getting national media coverage? Such a small sample is hardly the best scientific methodology.

[identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com 2008-11-21 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
The percentages don't matter what matters is the standard error. Even still the statistics used on such a small sample won't be all that powerful do there is some reason to doubt the significance of any statistical significances found.

[identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com 2008-11-21 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
(20 is a decent number for a pilot study though)

[identity profile] 0olong.livejournal.com 2008-11-21 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
...because the national media cares much more about the human interest value of 'science' stories than it does their credibility in scientific terms?