andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker
Technically, an election isn't over until the electoral college meets on  December 13, 2004 (the Monday after the second Wednesday in December).

At that point they will vote according to the results in their home states.

Kerry may have conceded defeat, but he can still be made President.

It _is_ unlikely though.

Date: 2004-11-03 11:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laserboy.livejournal.com
Let's hope it happens.

Date: 2004-11-03 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rainstorm.livejournal.com
I don't want to get my hopes up..

Date: 2004-11-03 12:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com
It looks pretty damn unlikely. I think it was smart for Kerry to concede at this point, he has clearly lost - contesting it up until the last possible point would have caused a lot of distress that would be blamed on him.

Date: 2004-11-03 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] derumi.livejournal.com
People in America can make a difference more than once every four years. There are people who represent us that we actually directly elect. Yet, we never write to them or ask them to do anything for us. We'd rather get up once and vote each November, and complain bitterly in between.

Date: 2004-11-03 01:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yonmei.livejournal.com
Kerry may have conceded defeat, but he can still be made President.

No. Because official vote counting stops when one candidate concedes defeat. The results now on the table are the only official results that anyone has to acknowledge.

Date: 2004-11-03 02:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yonmei.livejournal.com
Well, that's a kick in the teeth

Yeah. It's a kick in the teeth for all the voters who stood in line for six hours because so long as they joined the line of people waiting to vote before the polls closed, they could still vote.

Democracy in the US: the beta version.

Date: 2004-11-03 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
Actually, he has to officially withdraw from the race. The concession that Kerry has made isn't an official one. The electoral college still counts.

Date: 2004-11-03 02:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yonmei.livejournal.com
The electoral college still counts.

But the electoral college can make a decision based on the count when they stopped counting. And they can stop counting when one candidate concedes.

Date: 2004-11-03 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
That only counts if his concession is actually valid and official. His concession is still just the traditional phone call about winning, it isn't an official withdrawl, ergo, they keep counting.

Date: 2004-11-03 05:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yonmei.livejournal.com
His concession is still just the traditional phone call about winning, it isn't an official withdrawl, ergo, they keep counting.

That isn't what happened last time.

Date: 2004-11-03 09:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
I don't know this for certain, but to my knowledge, the last election was stopped by an act of the supreme court, not an act of concession on the part of Gore. However, I was wrong, and Kerry did officially concede the election, last I asked someone.

Date: 2004-11-04 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yonmei.livejournal.com
, the last election was stopped by an act of the supreme court, not an act of concession on the part of Gore.

But the point at which they stopped counting was when Gore conceded. They re-started again when he unconceded.

Date: 2004-11-03 02:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] missedith01.livejournal.com
Is that true? They don't bother to count the votes?

No ... you've got to be kidding. You're kidding, right?

And here I was thinking I was finished with outrage for the day ...

Date: 2004-11-03 02:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yonmei.livejournal.com
No ... you've got to be kidding. You're kidding, right?

No. I was outraged too when I found out that in the US they don't bother to count all the votes - that's why the pressure is on for one candidate to concede. But I found this out 4 years ago when the 2000 US elections were such a mess, so it's an old tired "yes, that's outrageous, but that's what happens when you stick with the beta version" outrage.

Date: 2004-11-03 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
No, it's not strictly correct. There is a concession procedure that is followed, at which point Bush would win because Kerry withdrew, accepting defeat based on current vote estimates. What [livejournal.com profile] yonmei doesn't mention is that Kerry has not officially conceded, so the votes are still counted until he does.

Date: 2004-11-03 01:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thefirethorn.livejournal.com
hmmmmmmmmmm...........

Unlikely. But we can all *dream*

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
7 8910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 9th, 2025 03:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios