When surrendering doesn't matter
Nov. 3rd, 2004 07:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Technically, an election isn't over until the electoral college meets on December 13, 2004 (the Monday after the second Wednesday in December).
At that point they will vote according to the results in their home states.
Kerry may have conceded defeat, but he can still be made President.
It _is_ unlikely though.
At that point they will vote according to the results in their home states.
Kerry may have conceded defeat, but he can still be made President.
It _is_ unlikely though.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 12:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 01:08 pm (UTC)No. Because official vote counting stops when one candidate concedes defeat. The results now on the table are the only official results that anyone has to acknowledge.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 01:54 pm (UTC)Well, that's a kick in the teeth for the people that went to the trouble of getting themselves votes despite not being registered to do so.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 02:26 pm (UTC)Yeah. It's a kick in the teeth for all the voters who stood in line for six hours because so long as they joined the line of people waiting to vote before the polls closed, they could still vote.
Democracy in the US: the beta version.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 02:23 pm (UTC)But the electoral college can make a decision based on the count when they stopped counting. And they can stop counting when one candidate concedes.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 05:06 pm (UTC)That isn't what happened last time.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-04 12:44 am (UTC)But the point at which they stopped counting was when Gore conceded. They re-started again when he unconceded.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 02:13 pm (UTC)No ... you've got to be kidding. You're kidding, right?
And here I was thinking I was finished with outrage for the day ...
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 02:25 pm (UTC)No. I was outraged too when I found out that in the US they don't bother to count all the votes - that's why the pressure is on for one candidate to concede. But I found this out 4 years ago when the 2000 US elections were such a mess, so it's an old tired "yes, that's outrageous, but that's what happens when you stick with the beta version" outrage.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 01:43 pm (UTC)Unlikely. But we can all *dream*