Date: 2019-11-04 01:03 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
I had a confusing misreading of the Virgin Media headline, because when I saw "Virgin Media to charge", it was totally obvious to me that it was going to mean "charging" in the sense of money. But it didn't!

I suppose this is going to be a linguistic problem in general with electric vehicles, but somehow, in the context of Virgin Media in particular, the wrong reading was exceptionally salient...

Date: 2019-11-04 03:32 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
On the same lines, it was totally obvious to me that the last item was going to be a medical essay on proctology.

Date: 2019-11-04 03:36 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
Yes – so obvious that I didn't even click through the link!

Date: 2019-11-04 03:00 pm (UTC)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
From: [personal profile] redbird
It sounds like the same people who think that Parliament has no voice in a Brexit deal, think that an agreement between the PM and the US president goes into force the day it's announced, which just isn't how it works. Trump has made a lot of "no, we're changing that" since he moved into the White House, but some of that is just 2 a.m. freeform Twitter ranting, and much of the rest is DOA as soon as it gets to Congress, or put on hold indefinitely six hours after someone reads the Tweet and files a lawsuit.

Even with a saner president (admittedly a low bar), and one who works better with Congress, treaties are often signed and never ratified--for example, the U.S. signed the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1992, but hasn't ratified it. Wikipedia (bless it) has a nice long list of treaties unsigned or unratified by the United States, going back to 1930. "Signed but not ratified" includes the Comprehensive [nuclear] Test Ban Treaty, the Paris Agreement on climate change, and lower-profile things, such as an anti-counterfeiting treaty. A nice press conference between Johnson and Trump at the White House would be meaningless.

Date: 2019-11-04 03:34 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
Somehow, given the miserable US back history you're describing here, the phrase "between Johnson and Trump" makes me imagine a meeting between Trump and Lyndon Johnson.

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 9th, 2026 06:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios