Interesting Links for 13-01-2012
Jan. 13th, 2012 11:00 am- George Lucas says Hollywood won't support black films‎
- Are smart people ugly?
- A brief history of facials (the NSFW kind)
- What would happen if they made it possible to pay to skip ads?
- Israel puts Godwin's Law on the books.
- What You Need to Know About ICANN's New Generic Top Level Domains
- 50 Awesome My Little Pony Mods for Geeks
- Men's Versus Women's Poses (both posed by the same woman, guess which looks better)
- UK Law will not permit sale of second hand MP3s
You need to read this response, Schwyzer & Jezebel are full of it
Date: 2012-01-14 04:11 am (UTC)Ginmar on LJ has made a lot of good rants about them recently too.
Re: You need to read this response, Schwyzer & Jezebel are full of it
Date: 2012-01-14 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 11:35 am (UTC)Yeoch. On the one hand, I really don't like limiting freedom of speach, even for superficially good reasons (I don't think its inherently bad, but it's normally leads to laws drawn way too loosely.) On the other hand, I'd sort of hoped that committed religious jews might be the population on the planet LEAST prone to randomly comparing things to the holocaust, but no, that ultra-orthodox group dressed children as holocaust victims in Israel, to protect not being able to attack an eleven year old girl in the street. It was seriouosly about the least tactful thing I've ever seen. And Israel has been getting more and more worrying theocratic, so any push-back from the non-ultra-orthodox majority is maybe a good sign, even if it manifests itself in potentially problematic laws...
no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 11:57 am (UTC)I seriously doubt that Hollywood refused to fund this thing because it has a black cast. It's much, much more likely that they know George Lucas has completely destroyed his reputation and that the words "George Lucas Production" at the start of a film have roughly the same effect on audiences today as "A M. Night Shyamalan Film" does.
Plus, and I wish I could find the article where some of the studio bosses responded but Skywalker Ranch Productions had more than enough money to finance this thing themselves and a lot of studio execs were like "Why the fuck should we invest in this film if George isn't willing to throw a bunch of his own money behind it?"
Beyond that there is ample evidence that Hollywood will enthusiastically back movies with all black characters and themes when they have respect for the script and think it will make them money. Think "Dream Girls."
If Spike Lee, Stephen Spielberg or Eddie Murphy had been pitching this film it would have gotten financing. The reason it didn't is because George Lucas is a turd.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 12:05 pm (UTC)Name a George Lucas Production that didn't make a staggering profit.
Edit: Found a list.
Last flop looks to be Radioland Murders, in 94. Everything recent has made hundreds of millions of dollars.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 12:27 pm (UTC)If he was pitching "Star Wars Episode 7 - Lando Strikes Black" and set the entire story on Lando's planet with an all black cast he would have had financing in a second.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 12:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 12:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 12:43 pm (UTC)And before he became a weird insane tax exile Wesley Snipes.
Samuel L. Jackson.
All three of which are considered A List enough to "open" a movie.
If there seem to be more white male leads then people of color leads recently I think it's more a matter of the fact that over the past five or six years Hollywood has been basing their blockbuster movies on comic books and Young Adult Fiction - two genres that heavily skew white. But they haven't done that for racism it's just that people seem to like comic book based movies and Harry Potter/Twilight/Hunger Games. I.e. they are guaranteed money in the bank.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 02:27 pm (UTC)It's possibly also down to numbers - 72% of the US population is white.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 03:21 pm (UTC)Of course, I remember not being able to return computer games and music CDs once the seal was broken (since the assumption was that people would copy them and then return them) so I guess it is to be expected.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 03:24 pm (UTC)Is it just by increasing product placement and persuading adblock to display ads that are totally ok because people really want to see ads if they're alright ones?
Of course, saying this, I don't know if people actually use Tivo and Sky+ to skip ads, or in fact to watch ads they particularly like. People often seem to enjoy adverts at the cinema, at least.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 03:27 pm (UTC)I'm actually very happy that Adblock recently added a setting that allows non-intrusive ads. Because I'm happy to have ads that are small and non-animated.
When I watch TV with ads in it (which is about twice a year at the moment) I fast-forward the ads. The 30-second-skip is very handy for this.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 03:30 pm (UTC)I have yet to see such ads anywhere online. The companies that supposedly have the most information about me are honestly the worst at targetting ads.
I also only just realised that you could use adblock to block the facebook plugin that pops up on random websites saying "oh hey, 5 of your friends liked this comically oversided sex toy/biased news story - do you want to like it and comment about it?"
no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-13 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-14 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-18 10:29 pm (UTC)http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/magazine/george-lucas-red-tails.html?_r=3&hpw=&pagewanted=all
no subject
Date: 2012-01-19 05:12 pm (UTC)But it could. So I'm going to give the old guy the benefit of the doubt.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-19 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-20 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 10:48 pm (UTC)