Sep. 23rd, 2011

andrewducker: (Default)
And, frankly, something other people would probably rather you didn't do in
their journal either:

If I post about how awesome X is, and then a bunch of people join in, also
excited about how awesome X is, and we're all dancing in a big circle,
waving our arms in the air and shouting "Woohoo for X!" then please don't
be the person who stomps in and says "X is rubbish."

Because you're taking something that people are happily enjoying, for their
own personal reasons, and mashing it down with a big grumpy hammer.

It doesn't make you cool. It doesn't make people respect your opinions
more. It doesn't change anyone's mind (if I actively enjoy X then I'm not
going to suddenly cry "What was I thinking? X actually made me feel like
someone stole my puppy!"). All it does is give you an outlet for your
venting, while reducing the happiness of the people who were, until that
point, squeeing at each other.

If you actively hate X then the place to vent about it is on _your_
journal.

This isn't to knock positive contributions. If you want to tell me that if
I like X then I might like Y even more, that's great! Deflect my
enthusiasm with your enthusiasm, and I'll feel enthusiastic about listening
to you!

And it's not to say that legitimate criticisms aren't ok - if X is made
from grinding up kittens into paste, and you think there's a chance we
don't know about that, then by all means ask if we know.

Discussion is fine. Legitimately asking why I like X, and what I think is
good/bad about it, also fine.

But please don't leap into a group of happy people and tell them that
they're wrong to like something, because frankly, it's just rude.

(Reviews are a different matter - posting a review which talks about
positive and negative aspects of something is asking for discussion of the
subject matter. I'm talking specifically about exciting, celebratory
posts.)
andrewducker: (Default)
There are spies in TTSS, but none of them have an exploding pen, or a car
that turns invisible. There are a few punches thrown, and some violence,
but none of it is Bourne-style martial arts or Bond-esque gunplay.

These spies are middle aged (our main character, Smiley, is in his 50s),
middle-class, and more prone to staring at files for long periods than they
are to abseiling off the world's tallest building.

This isn't the action-thriller that make up the majority of modern
thrillers, it's an old-fashioned thriller that does its job fantastically
well by just ratcheting up tension, showing us the investigation, and
playing things as realistically as possible.

John Le Carré, who wrote the original novel, recently gave an interview
decrying the unrealistic nature of Spooke. And he should know, having
worked for both MI5 and MI6.*

So what you have here is a portrait of foreign-intelligence operations as
they actually were, bumbling, corrupt, and terribly dull, except when it
isn't.

The actors are all on great form, the writing is sharp, and the direction
and filmographt gave me flashbacks to my youth - terrible wallpaper,
appalling clothes and all.

The basic plot is simple - there's a spy somewhere at the top of MI6, and
George Smiley has to come out of retirement to find them. It's incredibly
well constructed, telling large chunks of the tale through flashbacks
without ever leaving me confused.

It's not an exciting film. You won't come out of it wanting to be a spy
and save the world. But that's probably a good thing, and you won't regret
it.



*TTSS is based upon the real life hunt for Kim Philby.
andrewducker: (Default)
Given the following conversation:
Person A: "OMG THIS EPISODE OF THIS THING I LOVE WAS AWESOME!"
Person B: "Really? I thought it was a bit contrived/boring/silly/not up to usual standards for x/y/z/ reason..."

[Poll #1780923]
andrewducker: (Default)
But first, to follow up on earlier, given the following conversation:

Person A: "OMG THIS EPISODE OF THIS THING I LOVE WAS AWESOME!"
Person B: "I thought it was a bit contrived/boring/silly/not up to usual standards for x/y/z/ reason..."
or
Person B: "Really? I thought it was a bit contrived/boring/silly/not up to usual standards for x/y/z/ reason..."
or
Person B: Seriously? I thought it was a bit contrived/boring/silly/not up to usual standards for x/y/z/ reason..."


[Poll #1780938]

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 2223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 06:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios