This was originally a comment to the journal of
gomichanWe live in a fantastically rich world, whereby we have incredibly safe protected lives, access to foodstuffs that Kings would have problems getting hold of, access to technology that people 150 years ago would consider magic, and legal/social systems that are pure utopia compared to 99% of history.
We've also removed most of the risk in life, and most of the meaning.
It's not surprising that people feel directionless, lacklustre and unsure of what to do with their lives, when there are almost no direct threats to us. We don't need to work that hard and we're constantly told by all the media around us that money is not the answer, and success is not the answer and (frequently) love is the answer to all of our problems.
The problem being that (a) love isn't the answer to most problems and (b)what with people nowadays frequently expecting the world on a plate and the inalienable right to be themselves at all times, the compromises necessary to create a workable relationship don't exactly come naturally.
In my experience, it tends to be the smarter people who are subject to this
anomie. This is because they're capable of shedding the cultural baggage that provides people with meaning in their lives. They think too much, and realise there isn't an intrinsic reason to keep them going. Many people can then produce their own reasons, but to many (and sometimes to me) producing your own reasons to live by seems like playing a game when you wrote the rules- not totally satisfying and too obviously arbitrary.
Another thing smart/creative people tend to do is to wonder about what lies outside the possibilities they have. To try and reach out for more. Realising, then, that society isn't set up for people like you, doesn't help to maintain a feeling of chirpiness. If you never think about your lot in life, and just get on with it, assuming the people in charge know what they're doing, then you're probably not going to have such existential problems.
Modern society is obsessed with education. Both because it's an excellent way of increasing productivity and because it's viewed as a right. I sometimes worry that educating too much of society to too high a level will lead to too large a chunk of society being unwilling to live within its constraints. A small chunk of society pushing at the edges of it leads it into interesting new places. A majority of society pushing against the constraints could just lead to the whole thing falling apart. Or possibly to its transformation into some new, better and more free. Which one remains to be seen.
I highly recommend reading Brave New World, in which Huxley talks about the problems of designing utopia, about how you have to design it around people, and build in goals and meaning and drive, or the people grow bored and the whole thing falls apart.
Goddamn I'm rambling on today.