Date: 2025-11-24 12:49 pm (UTC)
juan_gandhi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] juan_gandhi
#7 looks really impressive, how fast things are going now. Pretty unexpected.

As to #1 - it's a myth against another myth...

Date: 2025-11-24 02:10 pm (UTC)
autopope: Me, myself, and I (Default)
From: [personal profile] autopope

The Thorium reactor cycle is very iffy when it comes to production of U-233; starting from Th-232 you inevitably get some U-232 as a contaminant, and U-232 rapidly decays to high-level gamma emitters which make it extremely dangerous to handle. (It's bad enough to make thorium-to-U-233 conversion almost a non-starter for weapons proliferation: you can make A-bombs with U-233, but the "dirty" U-232 in them make the material lethally radioactive to workers.)

A well-designed molten-salt thorium cycle reactor can burn up all the uranium it produces internally, so it's fine for power generation. Just don't go expecting to find it easy to breeed bomb fuel …

Edited Date: 2025-11-24 02:14 pm (UTC)

Date: 2025-11-24 09:47 pm (UTC)
bens_dad: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bens_dad
Maybe you can answer my confusion.

The article says that the fuel and coolant are mixed. If the reactor over-heats, the entire mixture drops into a storage chamber. What stops the reaction from continuing in the storage chamber ?

May 2026

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 45 6 7 8 9
10 11 1213 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 30th, 2026 09:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios