andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker
A couple of days ago [livejournal.com profile] cangetmad asked me to define "sex". If you've ever spent any time around lesbians, this is a topic that comes up, usually when someone makes a 'joke' about them not having proper sex (note to self: stop doing that).

Anyway, with a few tweaks (cheers to [livejournal.com profile] nancylebov for a couple of pointers), here's my response, laid out here, so that people can tell me how much of a wronghead I am:

I think there are a variety of things that are called "sex", and they form a kind of continuum.

1) Everyone agreed that "penis/vagina interface" stuff is sex. Some people think that this is the only thing that is sex, and that other things are sexual, without being sex. If you overheard someone say "I gave him a blowjob, but we didn't have sex." you'd know exactly what they meant there. Most people would include anal sex here as well - although some people would move it into category two.
2) Expanding the definition somewhat - some people agree that anything involving stimulation of the genitals is sex. So blow jobs are sex, mutual masturbation is sex, cunnulingus is sex, etc.
3) Expanding it even further - some people think that any physical contact which is intended to cause sexual feelings is sex. Which would include nipple-licking, naked massage, extended kissing sessions, etc.
4) Expanding as far as I can possibly think of, you have things which don't involve touching at all, like cybersex or phone sex, or watching "The Triumph Of The Will" together.

And on top of this, some people don't think that it's sex unless it involves an emotional component - because they don't believe that rape is sex (something I find baffling, as (to me) rape is clearly "sex without consent").

Oh, and I've heard all sorts of linguistic hypocrisies around this one - with (for instance) women agreeing that if they did act X with another woman it would be 'sex', but if they did it with a man it wouldn't be 'sex'.

The problem being that "sex" is inductively defined - it's based on experience, and what triggers in your head go off when you're exposed to certain acts/ideas. Which means that people are never going to agree.

To sum up, sex is in the eye of the beholder, and it no more matters whether what you're having is "real sex" or "lesbian sex" than it does whether you're having a "marriage" or a "civil partnership" - i.e. not at all to some people, and a vast amount to others.

Date: 2008-08-15 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thadrin.livejournal.com
Anyone having that conversation has either seen "Chasing Amy" too many times...or needs to see it.

FWIW the easiest definition is if person A is directly touching the genitalia of person B, it's sex. Should cover most variations.

Date: 2008-08-15 08:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wdomburg.livejournal.com
Wow. I better confess to my wife about all that sex I had when I was admitted to the hospital with pancreatitis a few months back. First there was the nurse who incorrectly inserted the catheter, then two who corrected it when they noticed I was peeing blood (wooo... threesome with bloodplay!), then the urologist consult they called and finally the nurse who removed the damn thing.

:)

Date: 2008-08-15 09:26 pm (UTC)
l33tminion: (Devil)
From: [personal profile] l33tminion
Maybe the above poster's statement should be qualified with "in a way that they enjoy".

Date: 2008-08-15 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thadrin.livejournal.com
How about with the addedndum "With the specific aim of inducing an orgasm."

I forgot medical procedures...and here's me working at a hospital...

Date: 2008-08-15 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joexnz.livejournal.com
sex is in the mind of the beholder?, not wait that exculdes vouyerism
argh!!!!!!

Date: 2008-08-15 09:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] myshanter.livejournal.com
Actually, since voyeurism is beholding someone, and feeling excited about it, without them knowing, it fits.

Date: 2008-08-15 05:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seph-hazard.livejournal.com
My girlfriend's definition, while seeming a bit pessimistic, is actually very useful - 'sex' is any sexual activity that could cause the transmission of an STI. (so of course needles or whatever isn't 'sex', but oral etc is).

I know what you mean wrt 'linguistic hypocrisies' - a while back I realised that I'd done things with men that I didn't count as sex, but there were women I thought of myself as having had sex with with whom I'd done far less! I have since readjusted my definitions, and my Magic Number suddenly leapt up without my actually getting any...

Date: 2008-08-15 11:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-s-b.livejournal.com
Bah, I was going to proffer that definition!

Date: 2008-08-16 04:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seph-hazard.livejournal.com
I was referring to sharing needles for drug use etc, as that can transmit an STI. But thinking about it, there's always needle play, which I *would* count as sex! [grin] Oh, it's so complicated...

Date: 2008-08-17 11:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seph-hazard.livejournal.com
I meant that sharing needles wouldn't count because it's not intended to be sexual.

Date: 2008-08-15 07:26 pm (UTC)
zz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zz
not that defining sex/notsex is even useful if you're not religious/desperate to lose virginity, but i'd tend to think of it (out of habit/convention than any particular reason) as requiring penetration by a real or fake penis, or a serious amount of mutual masturbation/oral where penises are absent, with everything else as "sexual activity".

speaking of continua, i was thinking recently that the gay-straight axis should be a triangle, with asexual on the other point. but then "sexuality"'s even less quantifiable than orientation.

Date: 2008-08-15 07:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dapperscavenger.livejournal.com
You think about sex a lot.

Date: 2008-08-15 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
You're welcome.

For more about how weird people are about sex (whatever that is), check out Virgin: The Untouched History by Hanne Blank. It's about the science and history of an area where everyone thinks they know what they're talking about.
Edited Date: 2008-08-15 07:41 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-08-15 07:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com
For me the answer is easy - more than one person are involved in an intentional activity where at least one person has an orgasm. Similar activities which result in no orgasms may be attempted sex, but they aren't (to me) sex.

For me, good sex is defined as a similar activity where everyone thoroughly enjoys themselves and has one or more orgasms.

Date: 2008-08-16 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seph-hazard.livejournal.com
What Andrew said.

I'm anorgasmic - I don't/can't orgasm, even alone. I've certainly had sex, and I've certainly had very good sex!

Date: 2008-08-15 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] myshanter.livejournal.com
What is important to me isn't "what is sex?" but what is acceptable to mu husband and wife, if I am doing it with someone not them.

Date: 2008-08-15 11:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cybik.livejournal.com
IAWTC.

Date: 2008-08-16 12:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
Funnily enough I was thinking of that as an alternative definition too - "anything I might do that my SO would consider cheating on them".

It's a completely un-rigid rule in that it'll change for every relationship (and in some open-relationship cases you may never "have sex") but it's an interesting way of approaching the definition.

Date: 2008-08-15 10:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khbrown.livejournal.com
"A couple of days ago [info]cangetmad asked me to define "sex". If you've ever spent any time around lesbians, this is a topic that comes up, usually when someone makes a 'joke' about them not having proper sex (note to self: stop doing that)."

You're the one with the hot lesbian sex = having tea icon, so is that a 'joke' icon that you'll be removing?

Date: 2008-08-16 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khbrown.livejournal.com
Maybe I didn't use the exact wording, which I couldn't remember, but that's what I took as the gist of it, rightly or wrongly. And like most humour, to met it has that element of who is saying it to whom / in what context is is framed, with all the implicit social power dynamics that can entail.


Date: 2008-08-15 11:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drjon.livejournal.com

...here's my response, laid out here, so that people can tell me how much of a wronghead I am...

How can you be wrong? You're saying "this is what all sorts of people think the word 'sex' describes".

Date: 2008-08-16 12:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drjon.livejournal.com
Ah, you mean I'm wrong? ;}P>

Date: 2008-08-16 12:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-s-b.livejournal.com
You might be. On the other hand, you might be wrong to make that assumption...

Date: 2008-08-16 01:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rahaeli.livejournal.com
To sum up, sex is in the eye of the beholder, and it no more matters whether what you're having is "real sex" or "lesbian sex"...

This once again flat-out states that lesbian sex is not "real" sex. Please stop that. It's offensive.

Date: 2008-08-16 09:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rahaeli.livejournal.com
Mmm, maybe it is a US vs. UK thing -- what I'm saying here is that by separating out the two terms -- "real sex" and "lesbian sex" -- you're creating a separation between them, and in the words of the great man, "separate is inherently unequal". And the emotional value-judgement contained by the word "real", along with the dichotomy created by separating both parts of it, means that whatever is not Real is Fake.

Cultural differences, probably, but it really made me grit my teeth. (Mostly because, yeah, I've had a lot of jokes made in front of me, and it gets bloody old.)

Date: 2008-08-16 08:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] treelife.livejournal.com
Ran into your post through TheFerret's link.

I think when someone is raped, the word you use (sex vs. rape) is really important. Rape is not just sex without consent, because the latter brings to mind someone sticking a part of their body in you without permission (like a tongue or a penis). But when someone violates you in that matter, they are hurting you mentally, emotionally, and physically in an incredibly abusive way. It's like the way some people abuse their children and call it discipline or love. It's not. Just because a parent disciplining a child may use a similar belt or paddle as a person who beats a child bloody, doesn't mean that it is at all the same thing. So sex can be a pleasurable and/or emotional experience (the emotion can be good or bad), whereas rape is a form of physical control and abuse that just happens to involve forcibly inserting body parts.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 8th, 2025 12:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios