pumped hydro

Date: 2025-12-18 12:38 pm (UTC)
fanf: (Default)
From: [personal profile] fanf

The first image in that article reminds me of this Practical Engineering video about the time that reservoir’s dam failed https://youtu.be/zRM2AnwNY20

I wonder what RheEnergise’s R-19 fluid is made of. Surely not rhenium salts, because although rhenium is very dense, it’s also rare and expensive.

Re: pumped hydro

Date: 2025-12-18 01:03 pm (UTC)
armiphlage: Ukraine (Default)
From: [personal profile] armiphlage
The petroleum industry uses Cesium formate or ZnBr₂/CaCl₂ solutions, with densities up to 2.4. Since it's brownish, I'd suspect something with bromine.

Re: pumped hydro

Date: 2025-12-19 12:08 am (UTC)
affreca: Cat Under Blankets (Default)
From: [personal profile] affreca
I'm close enough (the width of Missouri) to Taum Sauk that it's always what I think about when I hear about hydro power storage. The scar is impressive even twenty years later. The story that still amazes me is the park ranger's baby being found in a tree afterwards (alive). So like everything, I hope they're planning for failures.

Why Do Commercial Spaces Sit Vacant?

Date: 2025-12-18 03:15 pm (UTC)
jack: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jack
This example is really interesting, but I think it completely hides the main point. It explains things as if they're difficult to understand, but I think most people would get it fairly intuitively if you explained it like:

Company borrowed some money from the bank to build a building expecting to get $1million per year in rent. But after a few years, the rent turns out to only be worth $700k. That means that the bank and company will probably both lose out on the loan.

Someone (don't know if it's a government regulation or a tradition in the financial industry) decided that the estimated value of a building is based on the rent actually agreed, as if empty lots would only be empty briefly. That was probably true under some circumstances, but not these ones.

That means that if the company can rent *half* the building for $500k, they can point to the standard valuation which says the revenue *would* be $million if they could rent the other half, even though they apparently can't. That means they're still both losing money but don't have to admit it to their investors or government auditors.

I assume they'd *rather* get as much rent as they can get, but they can't admit the truth without getting in financial trouble.

I think most people understand "I took out a loan to start a business, but the business didn't really work out, but as long as I can keep pretending, I won't have to try to pay it back".

Misogyny

Date: 2025-12-19 02:50 am (UTC)
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] agoodwinsmith
Erm. I was going to make my remarks without reading the article, then I felt guilty, so I read it, but my remarks are not changed:

Our whole "western" culture teaches all members the shared values of the culture. Young male members can be seduced into acting out the shared values, but young female members are taught to be silent recipients. Young female members are taught to believe that young male members have special rights that are non-negotiable.

Any young female behaviour that echoes our shared-culture beliefs about how "real men" behave is equally dangerous and needs modification.

So. I'm not trying to make this just a "girl problem". I believe we are all complicit in ways we are completely unaware of and since we don't recognize our imbedded beliefs we can't modify them. Making aggressive misogyny a "boy problem" will change nothing.

That some of the impetus behind this move is influenced by racist "those people" opinions is a huge added obstruction to change.

This reminds me of my hot button "FAIR". We spend all of kindergarten and elementary school and junior high school bludgeoning children about behaving FAIRLY and then treat them like gullible fools for not knowing about the baked-in unfairness of real life when they reach adolescence. ARGH!

Re: Misogyny

Date: 2025-12-20 04:13 am (UTC)
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] agoodwinsmith
Yeahbut nobut - this will just entrench prevailing cultural norms because, like FAIRness, we are not admitting that all members of the culture are accomplices in the status quo. Making change a "boy problem" will just cement the attitudes/behaviour being expressed by newly minted members of our culture.

We need to be reviewing classroom culture and making efforts to identify how the current structure(s) actually support(s) extreme expressions of misogyny by subconsciously supporting pervasive expressions of low-grade low-stakes misogyny.

We, as a culture, are not interested in doing that hard work. Honestly? I don't think we, as a culture, are interested in change - but we sure do like a scapegoat.
anef: (Default)
From: [personal profile] anef
Not sure that a course on how not to be misogynist will have much effect. How about a course for all pupils on how to treat each other as human beings? Including specifically exercises on how to put yourself in another person's shoes. Might be better as part of a drama course.

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 2728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 27th, 2026 09:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios