Harry Potter News
Mar. 13th, 2008 11:54 amI don't tend to make lunchtime updates - but I can't resist spreading the word that the last Harry Potter movie will be _two movies_, released in November 2010 and May 2011.
From here.
I think this is a good thing. There's just not enough stuff that can be cut out of the book to shorten it.
From here.
I think this is a good thing. There's just not enough stuff that can be cut out of the book to shorten it.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 12:19 pm (UTC)Driving and pounding? Not since bloat set in with the fourth in the series has a Harry Potter novel been other than a tedious slog. But others' mileage must presumably differ....
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 12:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 01:01 pm (UTC)Do you retain enough interest to be watching the films?
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 02:29 pm (UTC)But logs are also good for burning.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 04:14 pm (UTC)I can see why it was necessary for some plotting reasons, but it dragged and I was bored.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 03:13 pm (UTC)Am I the only person who liked them being stuck for ages outside was actually good? Who thought that having them leap straight from A to B instantly would have been less satisfying?
I have only read it the once, and quickly, but yes, TBH for me it felt like padding time to fit the school year, and all the more irritating for it.