Harry Potter News
Mar. 13th, 2008 11:54 amI don't tend to make lunchtime updates - but I can't resist spreading the word that the last Harry Potter movie will be _two movies_, released in November 2010 and May 2011.
From here.
I think this is a good thing. There's just not enough stuff that can be cut out of the book to shorten it.
From here.
I think this is a good thing. There's just not enough stuff that can be cut out of the book to shorten it.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 12:19 pm (UTC)Driving and pounding? Not since bloat set in with the fourth in the series has a Harry Potter novel been other than a tedious slog. But others' mileage must presumably differ....
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 12:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 01:01 pm (UTC)Do you retain enough interest to be watching the films?
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 02:29 pm (UTC)But logs are also good for burning.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 03:13 pm (UTC)Am I the only person who liked them being stuck for ages outside was actually good? Who thought that having them leap straight from A to B instantly would have been less satisfying?
I have only read it the once, and quickly, but yes, TBH for me it felt like padding time to fit the school year, and all the more irritating for it.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-13 04:14 pm (UTC)I can see why it was necessary for some plotting reasons, but it dragged and I was bored.