Page Summary
johanna-alice.livejournal.com - (no subject)
khbrown.livejournal.com - (no subject)
laserboy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wychwood - (no subject)
surliminal.livejournal.com - (no subject)
octopoid-horror.livejournal.com - (no subject)
octopoid-horror.livejournal.com - (no subject)
octopoid-horror.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 01-09-2025
- 2: Life with two kids: A matter of probability
- 3: Interesting Links for 29-08-2025
- 4: Interesting Links for 31-08-2025
- 5: Interesting Links for 26-08-2025
- 6: Interesting Links for 27-08-2025
- 7: Musical interlude with a room full of children
- 8: Photo cross-post
- 9: Interesting Links for 25-08-2025
- 10: Interesting Links for 23-08-2025
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 06:30 pm (UTC)Whats possibly more relevant to the symbology is exactly which mutations end up on the side of 'good' or 'bad', Some Like Wolverine/Sabretooth have direct parallels. Others are almost directly opposed like Prof X's psychic mental abilities/Magneto's ability to alter the physical world mentally.
OMG I'm analysing a pulp comic!! Nevertheless...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 06:36 pm (UTC)If you haven't read "The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Klay" then I highly recommend it. Fantastic book.
And actually you're analysing a pulp movie based on a comic book :->
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 06:47 pm (UTC)Even though the creators were Jews, and thus there had to be a tiny bit of cultural conditioning creeping in, the whole concept of a 'superman' was Germanic in origin and somewhat of a fantasy idea in the first place. I've always thought of Jewish people as being very pragmatic - I suspect a metaphor-for-the-Jews-X-Men would look rather less superhero, and a whole lot more Mossad-like...
Perhaps the idea isn't a metaphor at all, but a cautionary tale with a moral. Said moral being that we shouldn't marginalise minority groups because one day that group may become able to wield power over the majority...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 07:10 pm (UTC)My impression is that the idea of a single superhero (as distinct from a superior race) goes back to Wylie's Gladiator(1930).
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 07:17 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Nietzsche
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 07:34 pm (UTC)As I understand it though, Neitzsche's Ubermensch can be translated as either ultimate or over-man. In which case Prof. X / Magneto are merely different sides of the same coin. This motif of antagonists merely making different moral choices that lead them to 'good' and 'evil' is something that recurs again and again in popular fiction. I suppose one could argue that this popular trend could have been deliberately utilised rather than being a cultural influence...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 10:42 pm (UTC)The concept of the NIetzschian uber man is quite distinct - it is a human but a certain perfect quality of human, vamped up as it were... (=> Aryan super-man, etc etc)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-07 06:36 am (UTC)I'm not equating this with the Nietzschian Übermensch, but I would suggest that such heroes are for the most part more direct fore-runners of comic-book superheroes.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 07:20 pm (UTC)I'd say that, originally, the X-Men as metaphor for Jewish people would be the dominant one, because so many of the Golden and early Silver Age comics creators were Jewish, as Men of Tomorrow says, with Xavier / Magneto dividing upon assimilationist / separatist lines (i.e. Magneto as quasi-Zionist figure?)
But with someone like Nightcrawler you have a character whose physical difference is more evident, so the metaphor there is maybe more Black people.
The gay people one I think would be a more recent aspect, simply because of the X-Men originating pre-Stonewall.
These are all speculation...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 07:41 pm (UTC)Mutants are also supposed to be teenagers, growing up and coping with bodily changes etc etc.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 09:47 pm (UTC)I suspect it largely comes down to nose size.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 10:43 pm (UTC)And there was me thinking about Nightcrawler :-P
U still up?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 11:18 pm (UTC)Of the above groups, the one they're REALLY not like is geeks.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 11:57 pm (UTC)To quote a prostitute in Desperate Housewives speaking to Bree: "Do you even HAVE pores?"
Just speaking about the first of the films, while I couldn't stand it, the look of the X-Men was nicely like the heroes of Starship Troopers, where everyone was pleasingly airbrushed and Athena poster-ish.
They're geeks in the same way a drop dead gorgeous perfect 10 model but with her hair tied back, wearing unfashionable clothes and glasses that aren't trendy ones is a "geek" and not pretty until she gets a trendygirl makeover.
As far as the comics go, I really couldn't comment.
To be honest, take any person or group that feels enough like outcasts and they'll latch onto almost anything. And, of course, the mass media takes very great care to ensure their protagonists are everyman/everywoman enough for the majority of people to identify with them.
It's why you have to make sure every muscle-bound brute has his pet dog, or fish, or takes up gardening, or has a pretty and very feminine wife (usually pregnant) or how that drop dead gorgeous ninja assassin mutant hero actually likes to read comics/has problems chatting to men.
So all of the options were true. Of course, all comic book villains are really meant to be evil Communists trying to bring down America.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-07 12:07 am (UTC)I wasn't aware that all geeks felt like that though.
I would say that I must be a geek, but I heard goths felt like that too, and teenagers, and girls, and gay people, and people who don't want children, and people who DO want children, and single mothers, and sensible nuclear families.
I'm sure I'm not ALL of those.
Truthfully, I'm starting to hate the term geek more and more. Did it get ironically reclaimed? Like (mostly American) goths/spooky types referring to themselves as "freaks"? I hate that.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-07 07:29 am (UTC)Nerd is still an insult though :->
no subject
Date: 2007-07-07 12:03 am (UTC)Therefore "geeks" being the most popular answer is unsurprising, since I imagine that of your journal readers, the "geek" category will have more members than the other three.
I am a member of various social groups and subcultures, and when I identify with things, it's because they're like -me-. So if I see something as a powerful metaphor, it will often be because it has a resonance for -me-. So I'm unlikely to watch X-Men and see it as a clever metaphor for the Russian Revolution or the Great Depression.
This came up with Buffy, actually and we've talked about this. When it was first on, some people I knew couldn't believe that every ned/trendy type/generic TV junkie at my work watched it and liked it. They didn't realise that the things they watched it for and identified with were sometimes only there for them, and that other people got different things from it entirely.