Stupid Fucking Security Systems
Aug. 17th, 2006 09:48 pmWhen the glorious company demutualised recently, we all got some shares. Which was nice.
Said shares are now managed by an online share-dealing system run by a third party. We were all issued user names and passwords to allow us to log in to this.
My "username" is a single letter followed by a 10 digit number. My password is a 5 digit number.
Because, yes, I can remember that kind of thing.
They _did_ allow me to change the password. To another 5 digit number.
I have _no_ other 5 digit numbers in my life. So I can't reuse any other password. And I'm not going to log into this more than once or twice a year.
Which means I can either change the password to something blindingly obvious, or write it down.
And I'm never going to remember the username either. So I'll need to store that somewhere.
Probably with the number stored on it. Because the bastards _won't let me_ choose a blindingly obvious password. Or one with a simple pattern. At least not one simple enough that I can remember it.
Why is it that my bank (who manage thousands of pounds) is happy with a rotating series of five questions, whereas my share dealing company (which is looking after £500 worth of shares I didn't even earn) requires security so annoyingly over the top that I'm going to have to violate basic security principles just so I can log in in the future?
Said shares are now managed by an online share-dealing system run by a third party. We were all issued user names and passwords to allow us to log in to this.
My "username" is a single letter followed by a 10 digit number. My password is a 5 digit number.
Because, yes, I can remember that kind of thing.
They _did_ allow me to change the password. To another 5 digit number.
I have _no_ other 5 digit numbers in my life. So I can't reuse any other password. And I'm not going to log into this more than once or twice a year.
Which means I can either change the password to something blindingly obvious, or write it down.
And I'm never going to remember the username either. So I'll need to store that somewhere.
Probably with the number stored on it. Because the bastards _won't let me_ choose a blindingly obvious password. Or one with a simple pattern. At least not one simple enough that I can remember it.
Why is it that my bank (who manage thousands of pounds) is happy with a rotating series of five questions, whereas my share dealing company (which is looking after £500 worth of shares I didn't even earn) requires security so annoyingly over the top that I'm going to have to violate basic security principles just so I can log in in the future?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 08:51 pm (UTC)One memorable password is all you need.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 08:57 pm (UTC)I mean, theoretically I'm actually perfectly safe anyway, because it'll be written down at home, in a drawer, and I'll be fine.
But that's not the point - if they're worried about security there are better ways of dealing with it than long strings of impossible to remember numbers.
There are a couple of places I use that I want to keep secure. I have _no_ idea what my password for them is. If I want to log in then I click the "I forgot my password" button, log in via the "change your password" link (with a random splurge of characters), do whatever I need to, and then log out. Nobody can guess my password because I have no idea what it is.
I forsee a time when there will be some kind of back-channel confirmation like this for all secure transactions. You'll either get a text or an email saying "Did you mean to spend £5000 on used bicycles?" and have to confirm that you really did...
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:02 pm (UTC)Funnily enough, I don't open any of them...
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:05 pm (UTC)If (for instance) you gave paypal a passphrase, so that all emails from them had the phrase "Gott Im Himmel!" in the subject line, you'd be more likely to actually open them.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:09 pm (UTC)I have no idea if Ebay actually send me useful emails. I don't open them since I know that most are spam, but I don't want to open them to check, so I just read the messages on the site itself.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:16 pm (UTC)But yeah, as I said, you'd need a clear _personal_ identifier in the subject line to let you know that it was from the people you'd actually given the security token to. It couldn't be a generic thing in subject lines they sent everyone (or spammers would copy it in about 24 seconds), it'd have to be something that only you and they knew.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:21 pm (UTC)I don't really want to invest time and effort in working out if they are or not, and since ebay has the built in messaging on the website, that's the safer option.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 12:53 pm (UTC)Well. Kind of. I use cart around YAPS on my PDA and I use it with a single non-trivial password that I regularly update. You can also use symbols as well as alphanumerics. Behind that are all the other passwords that I can't be arsed to remember.
I find it very convenient.
"I forsee a time when there will be some kind of back-channel confirmation like this for all secure transactions. You'll either get a text or an email saying "Did you mean to spend £5000 on used bicycles?" and have to confirm that you really did..."
I'd love for that to happen.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:30 pm (UTC)So I can hear you talk.
thats really all I have to say.
but you should. You know. Because, talking.
Does LJ have non-USA numbers yet?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:36 pm (UTC)ok. whatever.
But it would be you.
I mean, I'm just saying.
talking.
very good. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-20 09:35 pm (UTC)At least when he types, the rambling is cut out... ;+)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-20 09:36 pm (UTC)ha! Gotcha, and duly noted. :)
Sometimes the rambling is the best part, though.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 07:06 am (UTC):-P
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 11:32 pm (UTC)eg: 'This Would Be An Example' would be for 45227
That way you can remember the phrase and work the numbers out.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 02:20 pm (UTC)Incidentally, forcing passwords to be numerical is always a bad thing. Write to/email the company and complain?