But it makes _no sense_
Feb. 15th, 2006 08:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
At least, none that I've discovered so far.
According to The Guardianthe global spread of English is a threat to the UK.. This is because:
The reports author says
So because everyone else now speaks our language we're at a _disadvantage_?
Oh no! We can work anywhere in the world, with absolutely anyone and be understood across the entire of the financial and technical industries, whatever will we do!
Can someone please explain to me what the problem is?
According to The Guardianthe global spread of English is a threat to the UK.. This is because:
as the number of people around the world who speak English nears 2 billion, the advantage traditionally enjoyed by UK citizens is disappearing, with millions of students in other countries speaking English and at least one other language.
The reports author says
"When we are in competition economically, educationally or culturally, conversing in English alone is no longer enough." The report found that English is not taught as a foreign language in many countries, including China and India. Instead it is seen as a "basic universal skill."
So because everyone else now speaks our language we're at a _disadvantage_?
Oh no! We can work anywhere in the world, with absolutely anyone and be understood across the entire of the financial and technical industries, whatever will we do!
Can someone please explain to me what the problem is?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 08:14 pm (UTC)That's the problem! Now every body else can too, so there goes our natural advantage! Waahhh! Everybody sulk!
:)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 08:17 pm (UTC)Now if the entirety of Asia was learning Chinese rather than English then we'd have a problem, as we'd be locked out of that market entirely. But as it is, while it would certainly be handy to speak an extra language or 6, it doesn't seem to be vital in the same way it is for people speaking a minority language. Like, say, French.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 08:39 pm (UTC)In the same way that someone with a certificate in something looks better than something who doesn't know how to do it; someone who speaks two "business" languages well looks better than someone who doesn't. A lot, lot better.
If you try and get a job in foreign climes, your lack of any language other than English -is- a disadvantage, while if a chap from said foreign climes is trying to get a job here, then he'll speak both his own language AND English. It is an advantage for them, because THEY can work elsewhere, you can't.
Just because lots of people can speak English, this doesn't mean that when Joe Lives-Somewhere-Foreign calls his local tech support, he is going to want to speak English. If the tech support is based there, he might reasonably expect them to speak the local language. Which'd mean you wouldn't have a chance of working there. Someone -from- there, on the other hand, will have the pick of that job, or one just down the corridor from you in Edinburgh.
I don't know if things have changed, but last time I paid attention, England (at the least) was notoriously lazy as far as learning other languages etc went.
Please tell me this was a joke post?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 09:33 pm (UTC)And as I said, having more than one language is handy, but I'm still not convinced we're at an actual disadvantage because other people are learning English.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 10:46 pm (UTC)Wales seems to be doing quite well for itself as far as multi-lingual populations go. Scotland hopes to go the same route with its gaelic initiatives.
Note that this actually supports your point, as I totally agree with it and you've explained it well. However I'm just calling for clarification on the country you're talking about.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 08:45 pm (UTC)Take a look around - we're not in charge.
It's American English. I am always vaguely amused that (in my experience of Europeans of varying nationalities) very often teenagers etc will speak English with a pronounced American accent, using American slang (even more than the average youngster here)
Of course, I have no idea whether Americans tend to be multilingual or not. I'd suspect not, excepting Spanish and American English, but I wouldn't know for sure.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 09:01 pm (UTC)Your suspicion is correct. Most citizens of the U.S.A are monolingual. The joke goes that "Someone who speaks French and English is French. Someone who speaks German and English is German. Someone who speaks Chinese and English is Chinese, someone who speaks several languages is a polyglot, and someone who speaks only English... is an American." Spanish is probably the most common second language - or perhaps I should say the most common first where English is second.
Americans generally do seem to like an mild English accent, which means it's popular enough to many attempt, but is generally not present or studied enough for an American to actually get right.
I was surprised when I once had an Egyptian professor who spoke English with what seemed to me to be a German accent.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 09:48 pm (UTC)On the other hand, the reverse is not true. Because English is the predominant language in many fields, the English speaking countries of the world do not have the same requirements to learn foreign languages. As a result, we have a notoriously low percentage of the population who are fluent in any foreign languages, making it almost impossible for us to go to foreign countries and get a job.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 09:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 10:02 pm (UTC)Bring more Ice, Gin and Tonic Water, stat.
Date: 2006-02-16 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 09:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 09:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-18 09:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-23 02:52 pm (UTC)