(no subject)
Jun. 11th, 2004 08:31 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Results so far of the elections show how contrarily things can work out (and remember, these are local elections, not national ones - electing councillors to run local councils)
Convervatives have 642 councillors
Labour have 773
Liberal Democrats have 530
Look close, yes?
But if we look at the number of councils that equates to:
Conservatives: 30
Labour: 14
Liberals: 5
Presumably the vast difference there is down to size of different councils, but still, it just patently seems ridiculous.
Convervatives have 642 councillors
Labour have 773
Liberal Democrats have 530
Look close, yes?
But if we look at the number of councils that equates to:
Conservatives: 30
Labour: 14
Liberals: 5
Presumably the vast difference there is down to size of different councils, but still, it just patently seems ridiculous.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-11 12:49 am (UTC)For example, one of the reasons Blair has had such overwhelming majorities both governments is changes in the electoral boundaries that favoured Labour, coupled with a general dislike of the Tories after the Major administration. To get back into power now, the Tories have to get more votes than they did last time, and in different places.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-11 01:23 am (UTC)The Liberal Democrats have increased their share of seats in Sefton but the council remains hung.