Date: 2025-06-16 11:30 am (UTC)
vargrave: (Default)
From: [personal profile] vargrave
Saw this on the Latest Things page, and that second link is concerning, to say the least. I don't even know why I'm still surprised at this behaviour from Meta; it's par for the course from them.

Thanks for sharing.

Date: 2025-06-16 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anna_wing
A similar-in-principle technique is already applied to textile conservation. Print the missing/damaged bit onto a piece of clorh of similar weight and then weave it in by hand.

Date: 2025-06-16 09:42 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
1) “Because there’s a digital record of what mask was used, in 100 years, the next time someone is working with this, they’ll have an extremely clear understanding of what was done to the painting,”

You think your digital record of today will still be readable in 100 years?

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 27th, 2025 02:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios