Date: 2024-05-23 12:15 pm (UTC)
cmcmck: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cmcmck
The Tories! They despise Scots like they despise everyone else apart from their lot.
Edited Date: 2024-05-23 03:17 pm (UTC)

Date: 2024-05-23 03:05 pm (UTC)
ckd: (cpu)
From: [personal profile] ckd

I'm annoyed that the Unicode post didn't mention Go at all, despite it natively using UTF-8 (including for source code).

This is especially egregious since Rob Pike and Ken Thompson both invented UTF-8 and co-created Go (the latter with Robert Griesemer).

Date: 2024-05-23 07:54 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
7) US library computerized cataloging practice, which dates back to the 1960s and thus predates Unicode, may very well have adopted Unicode in the 20-odd years since I retired. Certainly they now produce records in CJK and Cyrillic (and probably other writing systems that I haven't seen), which they didn't do in my day.

But the way it was done then: all records were in the Latin alphabet. That meant all those for books not in that alphabet had to be transliterated. (Transliterating Cyrillic on sight was one of my specialties.) So the number of characters needed to be encoded was limited. Besides a few special letters (e.g. edh and thorn in Icelandic), most of the non-regulars were diacritic marks. But instead of having special characters for each use of a diacritic as Unicode does ("a" with an acute accent, "e" with an acute accent, "i" with an acute accent, etc.), the cataloging system had codes for just the diacritic marks. You could then apply the mark to any letter you needed, which avoided the situation I've sometimes encountered with computers where the Unicode subset it supports doesn't include the letter-diacritic combo you need.

Date: 2024-05-23 08:11 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
1) Why don't they just buy these competing companies? That's what Microsoft used to do.

Date: 2024-05-24 07:04 am (UTC)
hairyears: Spilosoma viginica caterpillar: luxuriant white hair and a 'Dougal' face with antennae. Small, hairy, and venomous (Default)
From: [personal profile] hairyears
An interesting point: and it raises an interesting question.

What if Google's acquisition strategy - and their investment in AI R&D - is informed by a belief that the current AI boom is a tulip mania for useless crap inflated by hype?

I recall that Google have been developing and deploying LLM technologies for machine translation for over a decade: they know the limitations and, if there was any use to be had in any of it, Google would already have deployed it globally.

Date: 2024-05-24 09:34 am (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
jnteresting thought.

So why do anything at all? But maybe the budget is negligable if you are Google.

I am an "AI" skeptic. Someday we will have great tools of this sort, to help us do technical tasks, I hope. But we are SO far away. The surface gloss may confuse many, and may actually be enough for task that are all about "surface gloss". But every (for instance) pro developer / engineer I know (including me) has found almost nothing but frustration and timewaste for anything other than making presentations. Right now the tools are worse to work with than the worst intern with the most over-inflated over-confidence in their abilities.

The picture and music "AI"s are scarily close to enough for the bland everyday background music /marketing bumpf for the "average" punter who isn't really into art.

Date: 2024-05-25 06:23 am (UTC)
hairyears: Spilosoma viginica caterpillar: luxuriant white hair and a 'Dougal' face with antennae. Small, hairy, and venomous (Default)
From: [personal profile] hairyears
There is a market for AI among customer service managers and public-sector executives available for lucrative non-executive directorships.

That is to say: benighted and besuited profiteers who seek advancement by cost-cutting so deeply that all value in the activity they defund will be destroyed, shortly after the parasites bank their rewards and move onwards and upwards.

Fortunes have been made already in outsourcing and offshoring costly customer service activities in banking, insurance, and utility billing; and - with extreme prejudice - in public sector IT.

AI is the next level in the process, deepening the destructive effect and opening-up new markets for cheapening and worsening the services and disservices inflicted for profit on the despised.

Date: 2024-05-25 08:52 am (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
I totally agree with your analysis.

I just don't understand where they think their profits will come from when us plebs can't afford to buy anything at all because AI took all the jobs...

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 2223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 06:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios