Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Life with two kids: The sounds of fun
- 2: Interesting Links for 08-02-2026
- 3: The light is rising
- 4: Interesting Links for 05-02-2026
- 5: Interesting Links for 07-02-2026
- 6: A brief history of Peter Mandelson
- 7: Interesting Links for 04-02-2026
- 8: Photo cross-post
- 9: Interesting Links for 03-02-2026
- 10: Photo cross-post
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 01:14 pm (UTC)Yeah, maybe spilling corporate secrets to a new employer, though even that can be applied unfairly. But besides that.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 01:46 pm (UTC)And, frankly, I think that even in the case of corporate secrets, it ought to be incredibly limited. People should have the right to take the things they've learned and apply them in future jobs.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-23 01:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-23 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-05-14 07:45 am (UTC)Proprietary computer chip architecture
The eleven secret herbs and spices / Coca Cola / the location of the official baseball red mud
no subject
Date: 2025-05-14 07:47 am (UTC)The other two definitely not. "You've learned how to make X on the job and are now forbidden to use that knowledge" is something I am 100% against.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 02:45 pm (UTC)After a serious fire it ceased trading. Eventually new occupiers started a bakery/cafe on the site. They wanted the recipe for the Chelsea Buns, so they found an old employee and got the recipe from her.
I suspect that could be called a corporate secret.
The owners of the new business even included a version of the recipe in a recipe book that they published. IIRC they say it isn't exactly the recipe they use, since the commercial version wouldn't work for domestic quantities.
I don't know whether there was an NDA involved but I never heard that the original owners had a problem.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 02:54 pm (UTC)"We taught you how to make a cake, and now you must never use that knowledge." seems incredibly wrong to me.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 09:05 pm (UTC)I don't see the casual link there
And I believe in very limited IP.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 09:07 pm (UTC)I think that if small businesses can’t protect eg recipes then large organisations who can eg outsource manufacturing or realise scale benefits will (pun not intended) eat them up.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 09:14 pm (UTC)I don't think that "We can't work out how to make this particular food" is a real thing. And I'm not aware of any modern cases of small bakers valiantly holding off the megacorps with their unreplicable recipes. Not when with a reasonable research budget you can do this kind of thing: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf504953s
And if it was then I'd be on the side of the additional millions of people who got to eat the nicer food over the 4 bakers who got to keep it from them.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 09:07 pm (UTC)I’m also not sure if this is 100% true but I think that if people don’t think they own the rights to what they invent, they stop inventing things.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 09:21 pm (UTC)This is interesting. I thought this argument would have low currency with you and the other one higher, but I got it the wrong way round.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 02:31 pm (UTC)I had been offered a deal and my professional advisers (including someone from my union head office)
advised me to take it, even though it contained an NDA. I asked about whether NDAs are a bad thing in principle. The answer appeared to suggest that it without NDAs there might not be similar deals. I wasn't convinced but didn't have a lot of energy to argue.
The NDA specifically says that I cannot mention a particular sum of money, which I can well understand from the employer's point of view.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-22 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-23 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-25 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-25 08:35 pm (UTC)I'd expect it to be time bound, because very few commercial plans are still useful after more than a few years. But I'd also expect it to be in your interests to keep quiet because otherwise nobody would employ you.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-25 08:39 pm (UTC)Yes but if I knew something that I thought I could deploy to the tune of making tens of millions (this has happened) then that argument might hold less water.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-25 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-25 08:54 pm (UTC)I am a sealed vault.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-25 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-05-05 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-05-05 10:48 am (UTC)