Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 21-09-2025
- 2: Interesting Links for 20-09-2025
- 3: Interesting Links for 15-09-2025
- 4: Interesting Links for 18-09-2025
- 5: Interesting Links for 19-09-2025
- 6: Interesting Links for 08-09-2025
- 7: Life with two kids: International Demon-Hunter Shipping
- 8: Whining about online t-shirt purchases.
- 9: Interesting Links for 17-09-2025
- 10: Photo cross-post
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2023-09-23 12:42 pm (UTC)In code, this seems to be the primary concern. An AI coding assistant is trained on a large body of code, and its output is at least in some sense a derived work of all of that code. Is it a derived work for copyright and licensing purposes? Lots of people don't want to risk it. So companies will adopt policies of telling their developers never to use AI coding assistants – meaning both "don't put their output into our products" (with risk of, e.g., GPL contamination) and "don't expose our proprietary code to systems that will feed it into the AI training set" (with even more obvious risks).
But apparently for art purposes this isn't even in the dialogue, and the question is just: is this image copyright to the AI artist, or is it not copyright at all? The third option of it being (at least in part) copyright to someone else isn't even mentioned.
no subject
Date: 2023-09-23 12:53 pm (UTC)Offering 3 million people the right to a 3 millionth of the copyright in something feels unlikely to occur to me.
no subject
Date: 2023-09-23 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-09-25 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-09-23 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-09-24 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-09-24 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-09-24 06:05 pm (UTC)https://www.tumblr.com/andrewducker/729175462375456768/lananiscorner-official-sokka-theryanproject?source=share
no subject
Date: 2023-09-24 08:14 pm (UTC)