Date: 2023-09-02 06:10 pm (UTC)
movingfinger: (Default)
From: [personal profile] movingfinger
4. This is... a bug. A programming bug that should have been caught immediately. A programming bug that freshmen would be expected to spot. A bug. Which the company should fix gratis, immediately.

Date: 2023-09-03 05:13 am (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
It could also have been a gross misunderstanding of the requirements (though you'd have to be very very very and very very narrow focused and blinkered to not think "hmm, excluding the non winners for other posts makes no sense". Or maybe stuck in some kind of mental model of a real world process like "candidate specifically applies for one post, fails." )

But - user acceptance testing should have caught it at the very latest point. My guess is there are no proper QA testers and no good communication with the business users that they also need commitment to test new software. Also likely no operations / support staff. It's one of the modern trends I thoroughly despise, this thinking that you don't need these professionals, and that clever enough ci/cd, DevOps, and alerting will be enough to keep a live system in the field ticking along and getting bugs reported.
(Sigh. Too many people only ever worked in small 'start ups' and to many otherwise clever CTOs/founders not knowing how it's done at scale, never having worked in large orgs or with hugely interconnected systems, that have real effects on people's lives)

They need to do a post mortem as to why it wasn't caught. And improve their processes so such things don't happen again.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 11:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios