Interesting Links for 06-05-2023
May. 6th, 2023 12:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
- 1. For the first time ever, the Green Party run an English council
- (tags:politics green uk england )
- 2. the bumbling WW2 German espionage attempt that was stopped in its tracks at Edinburgh's Waverley Station
- (tags:wwii history spying germany uk viaDanielDWilliam )
- 3. Is there anything finer than watching the Conservatives descending into civil war?
- (tags:conservatives politics )
- 4. The Harmful Side Effect of Cleaning Up the Ocean
- (tags:ocean waste cleaning life )
- 5. If you can't fart in front of your partner, what the hell are you doing together?
- (tags:relationships )
- 6. Science Fiction Movie Lettering
- (tags:movies scifi font )
- 7. Babylon 5 animated movie on the way
- (tags:movies Babylon5 animation )
- 8. Essays on Typography and Design in Science Fiction Movies
- (tags:movies font scifi viaFanf )
- 9. Waymo are running a successful driverless taxi service. Why is it expanding so slowly?
- (tags:driving automation business )
- 10. Republican protesters being arrested ahead of coronation
- (tags:monarchy protests OhForFucksSake )
no subject
Date: 2023-05-06 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-05-06 02:18 pm (UTC)3. Several things are finer. I would not undermine the joy of anyone watching this spectacle, though.
4. Ouch. :-/
7. Sounds good!
8. I have the book that those essays were compiled into.
no subject
Date: 2023-05-07 10:05 pm (UTC)Me too. I think I may actually have read it with a silly grin, it pushed my buttons so precisely.
no subject
Date: 2023-05-06 03:18 pm (UTC)Proof that you need more protestors and less kings.
no subject
Date: 2023-05-07 08:30 am (UTC)(I hope Andrew will forgive this as a fandom joke and not a violation of his grammar-crit rules)
no subject
Date: 2023-05-07 08:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-05-07 05:31 pm (UTC)At any rate, his only justification was "I like it more", and I don't know why people pretend it's a rule when it never has actually been one.
no subject
Date: 2023-05-07 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-05-07 06:23 pm (UTC)Not a victory, a veritable turd de farce...
Date: 2023-05-07 10:03 am (UTC)The question, for those who immerse themselves in it gleefully, nostrils flaring and declaring it the finest scent of roses in all Christendom, is: 'Boris Johnson or Rishi Sunak? Who is more likely to salvage the next election?'
9 WAYMO
Date: 2023-05-09 12:14 pm (UTC)1) experience with scaling up so they know how to do it quicker, cheaper, more effectively
2) reducing the mapping costs as part of the initial set up
3) lowering the capital cost of new vehicles and depots
4) lowering the maintenance costs per vehicle
5) having more reliable and more trusted technology so they can reduce per ride or per vehicle support cots
6) having better cash flows from operations e.g. being profitable or at least positive cash generation
And their nearest competitors will be watching them closely for some second-mover advantage.
Re: 9 WAYMO
Date: 2023-05-09 12:23 pm (UTC)So it sounds like buying depots and setting up the infrastructure to run from them is the big blocker.
But also, from what I can understand, they don't make a profit, so until they can work out how to do so (at scale) they aren't going to do that.
Best I can find on that is: "the company’s “Other Bets,” which include Waymo, lost a staggering $4.8 billion in 2020 and $5.2 billion in 2021" - but I'd love to know about them specifically.
Re: 9 WAYMO
Date: 2023-05-09 12:37 pm (UTC)You can have a positive cashflow without making a profit, particularly if a lot of your costs are things like depreciation of vehicles or amortisation of capitalised R&D costs.
Also helpful would be if Waymo's fixed costs were a relatively large part of their cost base. Again largely thinking of R&D costs of operations. So that as operations scale the fixed costs are spread more thinly.
I can see a situation where Waymo go from being very unprofitable to generating a fair bit of cash quite suddenly.
3
Date: 2023-05-09 12:18 pm (UTC)I'm pretty sceptical of his vote winning qualities in general. He's mostly won against poor opposition who could be painted as part of the looney left. After his resignation for the Covid parties I think the majority of the public are actively against him.
Re: 3
Date: 2023-05-09 12:25 pm (UTC)These trackers do not look good for him: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/explore/public_figure/Boris_Johnson?content=trackers
Re: 3
Date: 2023-05-09 02:18 pm (UTC)Re: 3
Date: 2023-05-09 03:32 pm (UTC)(Not me, I'm hoping they get a lot of traction, but the more hinged Tories presumably hope that)