Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Oddly recurrent stomach issues
- 2: Whining about online t-shirt purchases.
- 3: Interesting Links for 25-09-2025
- 4: Interesting Links for 23-09-2025
- 5: Interesting Links for 24-09-2025
- 6: Photo cross-post
- 7: Interesting Links for 22-09-2025
- 8: Photo cross-post
- 9: Life with two kids: International Demon-Hunter Shipping
- 10: Interesting Links for 19-09-2025
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2022-11-20 02:50 pm (UTC)I'm not sure how argumentativeness is a factor either, but I couldn't figure out why you said "I do not see what a second house would add to a proportionally elected house." What would make it less needed then than it is now?
no subject
Date: 2022-11-20 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-11-20 07:20 pm (UTC)As for their political-issue agenda, we don't in any case want these to be too different, or debilitating conflict will occur even if one house holds the political power and the other does not. But differences will naturally arise in the course of things, if only because the members are human beings and not party automatons. That's true even under the present situations of party discipline and three-line whips.
And they will especially arise if the two houses are elected at different times, and consequently the PR allocations are likely to differ.
What MTBC and Rhythmaning wrote is also applicable here.