In a change from my usual slant, here's a fascinating look at how training can help overcome things. In this case it can help children to learn to distinguish sounds much faster than they would otherwise.
As a note, I believe that people can learn/train to do incredible things. It goes without saying (to me) that people can remake themselves dramtically using sociological and psychological techniques. It's the genetics stuff which amazes me, because it seems so much less likely. That's why I'm fascinated by it.
As a note, I believe that people can learn/train to do incredible things. It goes without saying (to me) that people can remake themselves dramtically using sociological and psychological techniques. It's the genetics stuff which amazes me, because it seems so much less likely. That's why I'm fascinated by it.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-27 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-27 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-28 12:51 am (UTC)Something *useful* from university studies of dead languages.
Date: 2003-08-27 03:58 pm (UTC)The opening sound of "thigh" and "thy" seem to have been interchangeable in Old English/Kentish Anglo-Saxon. Modern Spanish speaking South Americans can have trouble with "b" versus "v" while the r/l issue for Chinese and Japanese speakers makes more sense when you look at the way the sounds are created and how they relate to people.
Castillians can sound like they have a lisp to other Spanish speakers and I have a friend who often says "wit" instead of "with" and occasionally tossing in "wif", usually just to watch me twitch.
Tres interesant, eh?
Ekatarina, who also knows such useless and arcane knowledge like that fact that "vat" and "vixen" are the only words of Old English origin that begin with the letter "v". All other "v" words are imported post-conquest. It was that particular dialect that remained dominant with those two words,... otherwise we would say "fat" and "fixen" as the rest of the Seven Kingdoms did way back when.
E
Re: Something *useful* from university studies of dead languages.
Date: 2003-08-28 01:28 pm (UTC)Having had some time to think about it I'm going to go for "ooh, cool."
no subject
Date: 2003-08-28 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-28 09:27 am (UTC)I mean, taking NLP as an example, as an explanatory system it lacks rigour, but it certainly works very well for a lot of people.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-29 01:00 am (UTC)Lots of things "work for a lot of people" that seem nonsense. Religion for one.
From what I know of NLP it probably wouldn't be effective for me. You can say what you ike, you can put it as positively as possible but I still demand concrete, measurable proof.
Also, logically, if it's as valid to phrase something positively as it is to phrase it negatively, then it is as valid to phrase it negatively as it is to phrase it positively. Some people might be 'happier' ignoring one or the other, but to me they both exist (and many others in the space in between).