andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2021-01-15 01:27 pm (UTC)
armiphlage: (Daniel)
From: [personal profile] armiphlage
It is interesting that they are expediting transit for "lorries that could demonstrate they are working for a big supermarket or supplier", rather than "lorries that could demonstrate they are carrying food, or have a work order to transport food".

Many of the big food retailers in Canada also sell clothing, home furnishings, and many other items. If that is the same in the UK, then prioritizing the big chains will crush both small grocers and small non-food retailers.

I do not know if that was the intent of the way they are doing it, or if it is just a side benefit.

Date: 2021-01-15 01:41 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
It is the case that many of the big food retailers inthe UK also sell clothing etc.

A couple (Marks and spencers and Waitrose aka John Lewis) are perhaps more well known as clothing, homewares etc shops.

It is an example of the lack of economic ideological thinking that goes on in the Tory Party at the moment. A generation ago several cabinet ministers would have looked at that proposal, come to the same conclusion that you have, and objected on the grounds that the Tory Party is pro-market, not pro-big business.

Date: 2021-01-16 10:30 am (UTC)
jack: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jack
Yeah :(

Date: 2021-01-15 01:53 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I agree with Marco Biagi.

It's been apparant for many, many years that the Labour Party's position was a bit stuck in the middle.

I think there is a route forward for them but it involves two brave decisions.

1) Become genuinely agnostic on the constitution. Enthusastically support indyref2 (with a line on - if only so that the issue is settled and we can stop talking about it)

2) Become more radical in their policy offering. Part of the SNP (probably Sturgeon's) strategy has been to be a bland centre-left party. The policy offering is mostly things that most people in Scotland would nod along with, without upsetting too many vested interests or requiring too much critical thinking on the part of the voter.

These radical ideas don't necessarily need to be further to the left but they need to challenge orthodoxy. Drug decriminalisation, devolution of fiscal powers to local authorities, the creation of a New City around Harthill.

The contrast with the SNP would then be along the axis of imagination and profound change rather than broad economics or the acute question of the constitution.

Date: 2021-01-15 03:26 pm (UTC)
mountainkiss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mountainkiss
How does that fit with being part of English Labour?

Date: 2021-01-15 03:35 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
That is one of the challenges with my scheme. At the very least they share a brand with the English Labour Party and Scottish Labour MP's would hope to support an English Labour Government. The worst case is that the Labour Party in Scotland is just a subservient branch of the English Labour Party.

Is Scottish Labour run from London?

I will leave that question as an exercise for the reader.
lsanderson: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lsanderson
WoW! Only three times? Anybody now alive who remembers the 1968 Chicago Democratic Convention would consider that an understatement. Also, see Vietnam War protests and Black voter protests. Or even our local NAZI, Bobby Kroll, who is retiring any day now real soon.
jack: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jack
I really liked Goose and I'm pleased by their willingness to portray a positive (albeit tragic) straight character, but I'm not sure he was actually as effective at portraying straightness as Maverick was.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 03:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios