andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2019-01-09 02:13 pm (UTC)
drplokta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drplokta
We need a change in the law to specify that historical agreements for residual payments or requirements for permission will only apply where money is being made from the exhibition of the material, either directly (e.g. DVD sales), as part of a subscription arrangement (including e.g. Netflix but not the TV licence) or by advertising.

Date: 2019-01-09 03:10 pm (UTC)
drplokta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drplokta
They've already been paid for creating the work, and if no one else is making money from its exhibition I don't see why they should, given that they were paid for their own work.

Date: 2019-01-09 04:06 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
The article uses Dad's Army as an example of a program that the BBC owns but doesn't own all the rights to, and thus has limited ability to re-release. So what about Dr. Who? They seem to have gotten the back files of that one out.

March 2019

3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 2223

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 22nd, 2019 03:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios