andrewducker: (running lego man)
[personal profile] andrewducker
Idle thought I had - and I haven't investigated it, so I have no idea if others have previously proposed this.

But by tying it specifically to the median, that means that (a) it would encourage policies that kept people's wages up and (b) they couldn't be accused of taking raises while the average person wasn't.

Edit: To be clear, as over on FB people seem to be misunderstanding this a lot, I'm not saying "Let's reduce their pay to less than the median wage." - MP pay is currently 250% of median wage,and that doesn't seem wholly unreasonable to me. I'm saying "Define it as 250% of median wage", what effect would that have?

Date: 2014-09-17 01:04 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] j_v_lynch
why median and not minimum?

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 2425262728

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 24th, 2026 09:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios