andrewducker: (smoking horse)
[personal profile] andrewducker
The SNP manifesto for the 2011 elections stated that if elected they would hold a referendum on Scottish Independence. Before the election took place they stated that this referendum would be in the second half of the parliamentary term (so 2014 or 2015). Having been elected, it seems fairly obvious to me that they now have a mandate to hold a referendum in the second half of the term.*

Therefore, for the UK-wide government to be suggesting that they could offer the SNP a legally binding referendum, in return for it being held earlier** seems to me to be political meddling of the worst sort. The UK government hadn't offered a referendum, weren't going to hold a referenfum, and all of the UK-wide parties blocked a referendum being held when it was proposed during the previous Scottish parliament. Therefore, the only possible reason they can have for getting involved now is to prevent the mandate of the legally elected Scottish government from being carried out.

I don't know how I'm going to vote, come the referendum. But I do know that every time the UK government interferes it pushes more people to vote for independence from them, and that by playing political games like this they're playing directly into the hands of the SNP. They don't need to sell independence more than they currently have, they just need "The London Government" to alienate people.

*Whether they have a legal right is another matter - but that would be a matter for the courts to settle.
**The current polling indicates, depending on the exact question asked, that either it would be very close, or there would be a No vote.

Date: 2012-01-09 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] andrewhickey.livejournal.com
I can't see anything about it only applying to England and Wales anywhere, and I know some of my Scottish friends were amongst its most vocal opponents.
(Of course the bill as passed doesn't have a lot of the problems the bill as written had, and in particular has a clause forbidding preferential treatment of private providers.)

Date: 2012-01-09 02:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] andrewhickey.livejournal.com
Correction to that, I've just discovered it in fact only applies in England. Neither Wales nor Scotland are affected.

Date: 2012-01-09 02:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com
I've already heard him using London when he really means the Westminster parliament, I wouldn't be surprised if he'd used the phrase already somewhere...

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 07:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios