Interesting Links for 21-12-2011
Dec. 21st, 2011 11:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
- A petition to support a constitutional amendment to stop corporations contributing to political campaigns
- The best sparkling wine is supplied by...Sainsburies.
- Is a cure for the common cold on the way?
- Awesome photos of dogs diving for balls
- Canadian university's AIDS vaccine wins approval | Canada | News | Toronto Sun
no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 11:08 am (UTC)I was just rechecking yesterday's post about porn, romantic comedies and disney films and realized none of the comments are threaded anymore (though they were yesterday) - this isn't the case on anyone else's blog on my friends list, so I suspect it's just a setting error, or some random LJ glitch, but I figured I'd point it out FWIW.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 11:18 am (UTC)Those dogs are terrifying! The teeth! They're like fluffy alligators!
no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 11:27 am (UTC)Test Comment
Date: 2011-12-21 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 11:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 07:51 pm (UTC)It's an old article BTW, from 2006, so isn't exactly news. This sort of thing shouldn't come as a surprise anyway given the number of blind-tasting results that have shown that some of the cheaper bubbles get rated more highly than the fancied Champagnes.
Wine is not just about flavour (which is subjective anyway); we're also buying the brand & that affects how we perceive flavour. We are predisposed to enjoy it more if we know it costs more.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-22 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 08:29 pm (UTC)I'm sure it's horribly expensive right now - but I wonder how long that will last for.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-22 11:05 am (UTC)Yes.
It won't happen easily, mind you. DRACO is a broad-spectrum antiviral that targets a bunch of viral mechanisms in parallel. But there are billions of humans who suffer multiple viral infections every year. Multiply by decades, and if it's used indiscriminately eventually one in a trillion viruses in one in a hundred billion infections will mis-assemble by accident in a viable form that by-passes enough of the antiviral mechanisms to be able to replicate. And then it will have a clear field.
It took about sixty years for gram-negative bacteria to play out from the introduction of Penicillin-V through to the evolution of NDM-1 resistance. But if you'd told Michael Crichton about it in 1966 he could have used it as a plausible explanation for the Andromeda Strain.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-22 07:26 am (UTC)And if it turns out that putting this stuff in pig's food makes them 1% fatter, god help us...
no subject
Date: 2011-12-22 11:13 am (UTC)From the PLoS One paper introducing DRACOs.
These are large molecules -- complex synthetic peptides. Getting them intact across the gut wall or a mucus membrane is a nightmare in terms of pharmaceutics; the easy option is to inject them. At that, you have to watch out for nasty possibilities such as immunological responses (random foreign proteins in blood stream = shortcut to anaphylactic shock).
Put it another way: it works on cells in a petri dish. This is good. But it's a very long way from working on a living organism, and this sort of drug is likely to remain expensive to manufacture and requiring delivery via intravenous infusion with medical monitoring for quite a long time.