andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2011-11-19 06:14 pm (UTC)
fearmeforiampink: (assasins have failed)
From: [personal profile] fearmeforiampink
See, I can see some stuff retaining the need for corroboration. But (from a brief look into it) it seems like some stuff that'd be conclusive (off the top of my head example; CCTV with a clear view of the person's face) wouldn't be enough on its own to convict someone.

Date: 2011-11-21 10:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
See also my comments in reply to AD.

There are bound to be cases where one piece of evidence is in fact going to be sufficient but even CCTV with a clear view of someone’s face can be faked. The standard for corroboration is pretty low but I’d like some second piece of evidence so that there isn’t a single point of failure in the system.

The point of corroboration is to make it harder for the state or for a conspiracy of witnesses to gain a conviction by presenting false evidence.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 2021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 10:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios