Interesting Links for 9-10-2011
Oct. 9th, 2011 12:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
- The 99c novel. I already know people buying these. I wonder where the market is heading
(tags: books business amazon ebooks) - Blackboards in Porn - just how accurate are they?
(tags: porn sfw blackboard maths science) - You can't have closure. I want to know if it makes you happier if you stop trying to get it.
(tags: closure emotions life psychology) - Fascinating piece on how we think can read each other's emotions, even when we can't
(tags: emotions perception AmandaKnox) - The Judge Dredd movie is having problems...
(tags: JudgeDredd comics movies)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 11:29 am (UTC)Um, publishing? Talking to the printer, getting your book to reviewers, getting it to distributors, arranging for it to appear in good places in shops, and taking the hit on the cost of all of that, so that the author doesn't have to pay to get their book onto the shelves?
Of course, some of that goes away with ebooks. And all of it goes away if you only want to appear on Kindle. But if you don't want to end up with a monoculture then you're going to want your book to appear on more than just Amazon, and that means dealing with distributors at the very least.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 11:41 am (UTC)Yes, there is a necessity for a publisher (or a lot of running around) in the dead tree format scenario.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 11:42 am (UTC)I'm going to assume you've largely dealt with authors of the technical variety. And not ones who find writing Word documents tricky enough, thank-you-very-much :->
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 12:15 pm (UTC)Kindle is a standard in the same way that .doc is.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 12:23 pm (UTC)Kindle is a standard in the same way that .doc is.
Exactly... It may be closed, baroque and rubbish but it's far better than the situation which preceded it. .doc may be a hunk of junk but the world before that was people saying "I've sent it in WordPerfect format... you could buy a copy if you like... or you could have plain text."
Any standard widely used (even a crap one invented by evil people for the purposes of doing evil) is better than a bunch of free and open incompatible standards with no take up.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 12:41 pm (UTC)The Kindle standard is not widely used.
In the same way that .doc is not widely used. It's 80% of the ebook market by most recent figures. I can only see that growing in the short term at least.
Everyone else uses ePub, which is generally well regarded, in my understanding.
Kindle freely converts epub to its own format. Nook started out with ereader pdb as the preferred format I believe but now uses epub as preferred format. The sony reader used BBeB Book as preferred format but also read epub.
Book sellers, a quick survey has a few epub, a few "ipad/iphone format" (whatever the hell that means), googlebooks and Foyles sells PDF and ebook... as I said "the good thing about standards is that there are so many...
Don't get me wrong, I don't like proprietary formats... at all... it would be great if epub somehow rose to be the dominant standard, but pretending it is at the moment is like pretending that ODF is the standard format for documents.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 12:55 pm (UTC)I've not heard of Amazon converting epub itself. Last I heard you needed something like Calibre to do conversions for you.
Waterstones sell in ePub and PDF. WHSmith sell ePub and PDF. Google Books do ePub and PDF. Foyles do ePub and PDF.
So it seems that everyone does ePub and PDF. Except for Amazon.
If I get get a new eBook reader because my Sony one dies then I have a wide selection that I can use - pretty much anyone except Kindle, unless I'm willing to start converting formats myself.
I despise monopolies that use non-standard methods to keep people locked in. It's why I won't use iTunes, and I won't buy Kindle books.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 01:15 pm (UTC)I despise monopolies that use non-standard methods to keep people locked in. It's why I won't use iTunes, and I won't buy Kindle books.
And presumably why you wouldn't use .doc format documents (or perhaps why you wouldn't until people reverse engineered the format) and (to a lesser extent I admit) .mp3 music files? :-)
Seriously though, for me, it's not a "lock in" as I can convert to and from any other format with ease. As the kindle itself is such a nice toy and the convenience of having all the books I buy archived with a single publisher, I'm willing to see it as the kind of relatively benign DRM that steam also provides. It keeps all my stuff centralised in one place so if I lose it I can get it again, I can shop at alternative places if I want and if the whole situation turns evil then I can rip the books to another format or steal them elsewhere and it's of the same "crime" class as ripping my CDs to mp3.
Mind you, there's still no actual substitute for MS Word on a PC or Mac to read .doc formats as everything else mucks up things royally.
Seriously, I don't think we actually disagree on the preferable hierarchy:
1) Widely used, open standard. (By far preferable)
2) Widely used closed standard.
3) No widely used standards but many competing standards some open, not freely convertible.
4) No standards but many ad hoc solutions.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 01:20 pm (UTC)And MP3s are playable by oodles of different players. I know there's a fee to pay for it, and I'd rather that, say, Ogg was the standard, but I'm not forced to use a single provider, so I'm happy enough to compromise.
In fact, if Amazon were willing to license out their encryption so that other ebook providers could allow you to read AZW files on their readers then I'd be happy enough with that.
And yes, I think we agree on the general hierarchy.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 01:29 pm (UTC)Heh... my question was in past tense for a reason...
I'm happy enough to compromise.
I'm willing to bet though that, like my kindle compromise, at least some of your mp3 compromise is illegal in this country (feel free not to answer).
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 01:37 pm (UTC)May be time to rethink though as an entire bookshelf of CDs is bloody huge as a backup system.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 01:41 pm (UTC)New music is coming in 90% through Spotify nowadays anyway.
(Which I don't mind being DRM-ed up, because it's a rental/streaming system, I'm not buying a permanent license.)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 01:11 pm (UTC)So you _can_ (and I would if I was buying Kindle books), but it's not something people should be openly recommending if they don't want a visit from the police :->
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 01:18 pm (UTC)(Actually, the government did plan to make that legal though I don't think they have yet done so.)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 12:31 pm (UTC)So they didn't add anything, they just locked their books down to just their reader, and their reader down so it doesn't support the standard everyone else uses.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 12:44 pm (UTC)Fortunately, I can rip the DRM off things I buy trivially so if I move away from kindle I can take my books with me if I don't mind a little bit of law breaking (in the same way that ripping my CDs to mp3 and listening to them on my mp3 player is illegal).