Date: 2011-09-20 07:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crm.livejournal.com
comment unrelated, loads of Windows Server 8 stuff published:

http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/BUILD/BUILD2011/SAC-973F

Date: 2011-09-20 07:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bohemiancoast.livejournal.com
My problem with Johann Hari was more prosaic. Whenever he wrote about a topic which I had professional knowledge of (which, as he was a left-leaning journalist, was often), he wrote utter tosh. I am looking at a typical example, when he accuses the Tories of studying a particular welfare model, ignoring the fact that it had been very thoroughly studied and drawn on by Labour previously, and then goes on to (I hope not willfully) misunderstand benefits public spending, implying that expenditure on income replacement benefits is far lower than it actually is. This is not the standard journalistic flaw of failing to note details correctly; his entire column is built on the facts he doesn't understand. I am not sure that any sort of journalism ethics course would help with that.

Date: 2011-09-20 03:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
There's a lot of bad journalism about. I spent a little time doing public affairs for an energy company. The base quality of journalism appeared poor. Science or energy correspondents confusing megawatts and megawatthours. But beyond a basic error of fact some profound difficulties getting it.

For example it takes at least five years to build a power station and you expect to run it and pay for it over 2o-60 years. Costs are set in decades, prices in half hourly blocks. This uncertainty drives a lot of behaviour in the industry but I never really got the feeling that the journalists I was talking to really got it.

Date: 2011-09-20 08:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kerrypolka.livejournal.com
Another striking essay on the conflation of Christianity and Judaism and how farmful that is is [livejournal.com profile] nextian's Whose stories are they?

Date: 2011-09-20 08:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kerrypolka.livejournal.com
Harmful! Not farmful.

Date: 2011-09-23 08:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anef.livejournal.com
That is fascinating. Thank you for the link.

Date: 2011-09-20 08:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] henriksdal.livejournal.com
So tempted to text GO PREY to your phone now... > :)

Date: 2011-09-20 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com
Touch screen: I want the roll-up keyboard like in Star Trek please.

Song dataset: I didn't even know this dataset existed! Also, minor fail on the results being entirely images; means I can't search to see if the code found White Rabbit.

Date: 2011-09-20 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
I think the transparent film touch screen thing typifies where I think a lot of economic growth is going to come from over the next couple of decades as we meander through the current* Kondratieff wave. The technology is way cool but like the author of the article I’m struggling to think of useful things to do with it. I think we’ll spend a lot of time over the next twenty years finding useful things to do with things we’ve already invented by bolting them together.

*Current that is if you believe in them or on the other hand think we may be having more than one at the same time this time round.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 26th, 2025 07:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios