Date: 2011-05-31 08:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
Hmmm. Question is, are they making "The Hobbit" and "A film to fit between The Hobbit and The Fellowship" or are they making The Hobbit in two parts? If it's the former then it's fine, but if it's the latter then the whole bringing back Orlando Bloom as Legolas thing (amongst others) is only going to go badly I fear.

Date: 2011-05-31 09:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
Huh? Either the first film ends after the Battle of Five Armies and Bilbo leaving the mountain, or it's late in the second film. Can't be both.

Date: 2011-05-31 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
I hope they don't stuff too much extra into the original story. The Hobbit is so perfectly self-contained. I could maybe forgive them breaking the films at the cliff-hanger of Smaug's attack on Laketown and then doing an extra 2/3 of a film, post-Hobbit as it were, although if Legolas, etc, turn up before then I may have to shoot Peter Jackson. Elrond, Gandalf and Bilbo should be the only ones from LOTR that appear in the basic Hobbit.

I like LOTR but there's only so much screwing with the story you can do and making Arwen's role in LOTR so prominent took a while to forgive (whither Glorfindel?) There's no reason at all why Legolas and Frodo should appear in these films (specially as Frodo wasn't even born until some 30 years after The Hobbit took place and Bilbo adopted him years after that).

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
45 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 1415 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 11:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios