andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker
From Rotten Tomatoes, based on percentage of critics giving a positive review. After Black Swan I've added in some of the best rated movies from the IMDB in 2010 with at least 1000 votes.

[Poll #1673673]

And I'm bound to have missed out something awesome that I'm just too unhip to have seen. Fill me in in the comments.

Date: 2011-01-28 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lpetrazickis.livejournal.com
A GREAT/GOOD distinction might be useful in this case.

Date: 2011-01-28 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meaningrequired.livejournal.com
I loved Shutter Island!

Date: 2011-01-28 06:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snarlish.livejournal.com
I found Shutter Island good for what it was, but bad for when it tried to go beyond what it was. Also, I think only good on big movie theatre screen.

You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-28 01:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lsanderson.livejournal.com
The Meh option
Edited Date: 2011-01-28 01:52 pm (UTC)

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-28 01:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com
Indeed, I wanted this for Harry Potter.

I've hardly seen any of those and to think when I was an undergrad I used to go to the cinema or the university film society about twice a week...

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-28 02:27 pm (UTC)
zz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zz
i wanted to like harry potter, but somehow it felt like a collection of game cutscenes rather than a film.

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-28 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
Yeah, only if we can be bothered. Of the three films I rated GOOD, only one is GOOD, the other two were OK.

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-28 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spacelem.livejournal.com
What if you click a radio button, and then decide you're not sure? You can't unclick a radio button. Ideally you'd have a radio/checkbox hybrid. It accepts either 1 or 0 (or more if you need it) inputs across all the options.

Good/bad works, but good/bad/other is better (people are comfortable with "other", it makes them feel that their choice is somehow recorded, even if it isn't really).

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-28 07:11 pm (UTC)
fearmeforiampink: (Bunny ASCII)
From: [personal profile] fearmeforiampink
What if you click a radio button, and then decide you're not sure? You can't unclick a radio button.


Hit refresh?

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-30 12:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spacelem.livejournal.com
Hardly convenient if you have a long form.

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-30 04:23 pm (UTC)
fearmeforiampink: (more dots)
From: [personal profile] fearmeforiampink
True enough. I was arguing in the specific case rather than the general – if I did so on this survey, I'd not be bothered about hitting refresh and re-entering the data.

On longer forms I agree it could be more of an annoyance to do so.

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-28 03:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cairmen.livejournal.com
In which case...

Harry Potter - Pls grade film stock proprly. kthnkx.
Inception - Wobbly.

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-29 05:34 am (UTC)
zz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zz
Harry Potter - Pls grade film stock proprly. kthnkx.

if this by any chance means "light things so i can actually see the things that are meant to be spooky and dramatic", and/or "a gloomy plot element doesn't require the colours to be washed out", then +1.

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-29 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cairmen.livejournal.com
It does indeed.

My impression was that it's not that the scenes had been lit badly - they looked like they probably contained full contrast and colour depth in the original - but that the subsequent "grading" (colour-correction, as it's sometimes known) process had been used to desaturate the hell out of them and push them toward an extremely shadowy tone, to the point that when I saw the first few scenes in the cinema I thought the print was knackered, rather than anything to do with the filmmaking itself.

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-29 09:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lsanderson.livejournal.com
But, but, but, there's no clicky things in comments!

Re: You forgot...

Date: 2011-01-29 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 0olong.livejournal.com
clicky clicky clicky

Date: 2011-01-28 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
I am ashamed to admit that I have seen none of these.

-- Steve's cinematic 2010 was pretty much exclusively Netflix and DVDs.

Date: 2011-01-28 11:09 pm (UTC)
fearmeforiampink: (Nothing's the same)
From: [personal profile] fearmeforiampink
Ditto, on the seeing none. I've done some DVDs, and just generally, watched less films.

Though in my case, I think it's because I really don't like going to the cinema alone, and over the last year or so I've been in the process of slowly spending less time with one friendship group and more with another, which has left me in the situation where I'm no longer spending enough time with the old group to hear when there's a plan to go to the cinema, and I'm not yet fully in and spending enough time with the new group to get that either.

And/or my choice in films – the last three I went to see were Tron, Red, and Despicable Me. Before that was... I think Watchmen.

Date: 2011-01-28 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eatsoylentgreen.livejournal.com
haven't seen a one! I have to get out more. Of course it doesn't help that movies cost $10.

Date: 2011-01-28 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] recycled-sales.livejournal.com
Bah to binary decisions! Toy Story 3 was alright, but it didn't really hold me like the first two. Whether I've grown up or it was just a bit mediocre I don't know. It's entirely possible having a cinema filled with chattering children affected it too.

Date: 2011-01-28 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnbobshaun.livejournal.com
"Best Worst Movie" springs to mind for movies not on that list. Think it was actually 2009 but it didn't really get seen anywhere other than at festivals until 2010.

I also really want to see "Enter The Void" and "Exit Through The Gift Shop" but haven't as of yet.

Date: 2011-01-28 03:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strawberryfrog.livejournal.com
I should have seen the Illusionist.
"Black Swan" is to me more like a 2011 movie - it came out in the UK in January, and I'm planning on seeing it soon. The "not seen" on that means something different to the other "not seen"s

Date: 2011-01-28 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snarlish.livejournal.com
I'm somewhat surprised there's only 1/6th of voters to have seen The Illusionist... everyone in scotland voting on this should have seen it already!

Date: 2011-01-28 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pisica.livejournal.com
I need the 'have not seen the movie but read the book so will be irrationally smug' option on a couple of these.

Toy Story 3 was awesome, but then, I saw it on my birthday with only 3 other people in the entire cinema, and none of them talked during the movie, so it was like heaven.

Date: 2011-01-28 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cybik.livejournal.com
Some of the "GOOD" ones are with caveats. For example The King's Speech, which was great apart from the scene with Stanley Baldwin's resignation which was totally MADE UP TOSH. But the rest was awesomegood.

Date: 2011-01-28 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wg.livejournal.com
I voted good for everything I have seen on the list, but some of those are, er, gooder than others. The Town was perfectly watchable thanks to a nice cast but nothing special. Scott Pilgrim was fun overall, but quite a few things didn't work all that well for me.

I know I have quite a film habit compared to many folks (7 at the cinema and 7 at home so far this month), but I am surprised so few people who have voted so far have seen 127 Hours and Black Swan. Although I was taken aback to watch the latter in a huge sold out opening night screening, as I hadn't thought it would have a very wide appeal. I really should dust off the LJ and actually write about what I watch as well as keeping a list.

Really looking forward to True Grit.

Date: 2011-01-28 05:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladysisyphus.livejournal.com
Did you read the Scott Pilgrim comics? Because a lot of the movie's strangeness was due to its being a loving homage to the (utterly fantastic) comic, and the movie's enjoyable enough ending is nothing like the comic's jaw-dropping but ultimately unfilmable conclusion. So really, I'm not disagreeing with your assessment of the movie so much as taking an opportunity to talk up the source material.

I loved True Grit so, so much.

Date: 2011-01-29 03:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bohemiancoast.livejournal.com
I clearly need to read the comic. Scott Pilgrim was best for me when it was weirdest, and worst when it decided to go into lovingly filmed action sequence mode; but it felt like chunks were missing and I guess that's all in the books. On the whole there was loads to like; lots of things that I really don't think have been tried in films before; and what tipped me from BAD to GOOD on the binary scale was a couple of *superb* lines.

Date: 2011-01-29 03:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladysisyphus.livejournal.com
If you like the lines, may I present my wife's lj icons as (often contextless) indicators of the sheer brilliance of the comic.

I agree that the action sequences often lost me -- especially the Katayanagi fight, which is so many billion times more amazing in the comic, geez.

Date: 2011-01-29 11:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wg.livejournal.com
I know many people who really love the comics, so I know I'm missing out on quite a lot of depth and stuff from them. I'm intending to get round to them at some point :)

Date: 2011-01-29 03:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apostle-of-eris.livejournal.com
Inception would have been better with 1/10 the budget.

The Illusionist did justice both to Tati and the the creators of Triplets of Belleville. That is very high praise.

Date: 2011-01-29 05:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undeadbydawn.livejournal.com
I have only very recently rediscovered Cinema [I've always loved film] and so am WAAAAY behind on this. 127 Hours, however, is the best thing I've seen in a very long time. I plan to watch Inception as soon as I can convince myself to buy the DVD. The gf has Scott Pilgrim, which will be viewed very soon. I can't remember whether I've seen Harry Potter. I have no [current] interest in any of the rest but have been reliably informed that all are good, if not brilliant.

Is it just me...

Date: 2011-01-29 09:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lsanderson.livejournal.com
Or is Not Seen winning?

Date: 2011-01-29 09:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 0olong.livejournal.com
I feel like this post may have been designed to make us feel like we're not going to the cinema enough.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 4th, 2025 08:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios