Date: 2011-03-08 12:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peteyoung.livejournal.com
I'm certainly aware of my own language simplifying a little when Miles is learning new words along with their function in language, but he picks it all up very quickly now and with very little coaching. What will probably interest me most in the coming months is how he will learn to separate the Thai and English words he knows as he realises he's got two different ways of saying the same thing using either a tonal or a non-tonal language (Thai has 5 tones).

Date: 2011-03-08 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eatsoylentgreen.livejournal.com
for the "no such thing as a safe level of alcohol consumption" article there is only one link to a health study, and it's a dead link.

Date: 2011-03-08 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com
I think Greg Callus's comment to the article sums up my feelings pretty well. It all rather depends on how you define 'safe' - Prof Nut seems to be using a definition which equates to 'poses no risks at all'.

Date: 2011-03-09 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
I presume you posted the 1999 film link as a bit of a joke or talking point?

Films of the 00s (influenced by 99 et al) represent a break from the 90s, 90s represented a break from the cinema of the 80s, the 80s of the 70s, the 70s of the 60s, the 60s of the mores of the 50s. Plenty of the quotes or soundbites about film structure or whatever could, with a few minor changes, have been said in the early 90s about the 80s, or the 70s about the 60s. You could pick a year in any decade and say "yep this one represented a break from how things were before" and it'd be true. I mean, I agree that some of those films in 1999 were very influential, but they didn't change things more than the films you could no doubt find if you looked at parts of the 80s or 70s or whatever,

I'd agree that, in the heyday of the studio system it might well be more difficult to find an independent film with the same visual quality, but that's about it. Apocalypse Now, for example, was an independent film.

Maybe I'm misreading it - if it's just about how 1999 influenced the next few years, that's fine. The tone of some of it seems to be OMG CINEMA AFTER 1999 WILL NOT BE THE SAME AS THE 100 YEARS BEFORE, that's just bollocks. The entire article could be summed up as "policeman are getting younger."

The thing that I would argue changed TV and quite possibly film was in 2005, not 1999.

Date: 2011-03-09 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnbobshaun.livejournal.com
I'd say about 2002, or whenever DV became a viable filmmaking format.

Date: 2011-03-09 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
Youtube in 2005 follows on from the rise of DV in 2002 so yeah, fair point

I still don't want to call that decade the "noughties".

Date: 2011-03-09 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
<3 william shatner

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
8 9 10 11 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 12th, 2026 10:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios