andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2011-02-17 11:58 am (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
Grah, I knew there was something missing in my links post yesterday, will have to post separately to highlight it later--the Monbiot is wrong post is written by a friend in London at my request (well, more like badgering).

That's the edited down version...

Date: 2011-02-17 12:28 pm (UTC)
pseudomonas: per bend sinister azure and or a chameleon counterchanged (Default)
From: [personal profile] pseudomonas
Is there a full version? Also, is there any analysis that's available not on a party-political website?

Date: 2011-02-17 01:04 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
Full version, alongside drafts and other commentary, is on the Lib Dem Voice forum, which I've seen you posting to.

For other analysis, I'm guessing you'd need to trawl tax specialist websites and similar, I've not seen it, which is why I asked "Max" to write that.

Date: 2011-02-17 11:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pete stevens (from livejournal.com)
It took me about five minutes research to conclude that yet again George was producing a referenced article that was wrong and being taken at face value by a whole bunch of stupid people, c.f. my comment here

http://faithinfire.livejournal.com/77612.html?thread=526380#t526380

Basically,

a: there is no meaningful tax cut
b: we used to tax this but the EU told us that was illegal five years ago

Date: 2011-02-17 12:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cairmen.livejournal.com
I asked an accountant friend and got the same answer "Er, no."

I'm very disappointed in the Grauniad for publishing bollocks like this. A couple of scaremongering journalists are really starting to give them a bad name.

When I've heard friends refer to them as "the liberal equivalent of the Daily Mail" you know things are going seriously wrong.

Date: 2011-02-17 01:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pete stevens (from livejournal.com)
Indeed, what's most irritating is a good number of people I previously considered intelligent friends propagated it fairly widely - certainly at one point it was about 1/3rd of my facebook status feed. Considering they nearly all had Oxbridge degrees and are younger than me I was left sighing about declining standards of education.

Date: 2011-02-17 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wildeabandon.livejournal.com
I don't think it's really about declining standards of education, so much as even clever people not being good at correcting for their own biases unless they're constantly vigilant about it. When you read a story that fits those biases, you're far less likely to fact-check it.

Date: 2011-02-17 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pete stevens (from livejournal.com)
Maybe my standards are too high. I'd hoped that people would fact-check things before going out of their way to pressure you into signing petitions or widely publicising things, either that or at least question things a little.

Similarly there's been lots of completely uncritical stuff about the Forestry Commission sale. I've no idea what the actual impact would be (I'm not sure anyone else does either which is why I don't support the rushed sell off) but complaining that the UKs largest Christmas tree supplier might cut down trees as a result of the sell-off is patently ridiculous, what do these people think the Forestry Commission is for?

Date: 2011-02-17 03:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
I have a similar frustration with the Guardian - biased opinions is one thing but I at least want to be able to trust a broadsheet for basic facts when I'm flying into a frenzy of liberal rage. Mind you, I think the Daily Mail is a little harsh - I'll give it the Telegraph.

Date: 2011-02-17 11:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] communicator.livejournal.com
Re: change and the public sector. It is not impossible for the public sector to implement change intelligently, but the task hasn't been done. In my organisation I know there were teams that were wasting money, and others that were generating income many multiples of what they cost the public purse. A suitable person could have been found to investigate, make this distinction, and implement a budget restructure. Heck, I could have done it myself. Instead we have been closed down wholesale, including the revenue generating streams. The net result to the public purse will be a loss greater than the savings. But nobody was given the job of managing it with a view to realising improved cost/benefit ratio. Just 'cut'.

Date: 2011-02-17 12:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] communicator.livejournal.com
Simply give a person the job of making it happen - if nobody is given the job then the job won't be done. Similarly, if an order comes down from on high 'stop everything you are doing' then the work will just stop. It's not lack of ability or will - public sector people are just people. As I say, I could have literally done it myself, and I am (was) employed in the public sector. Our Chief exec could have done it, for sure.

Date: 2011-02-17 11:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
Ok, I'll say flat out that I've never hooked up my XBox to XBox live because the idea of paying money to compete against 14 year olds who have way more time on their hands to practice Guitar Hero holds no attraction to me.

That said, I have been in Internet cafes trying to get work done while teenage boys were in their playing various war games where they were hooked up to microphones and could make comments and talk to each other while playing.

This almost always ended up being a long running stream of "Shot you faggot", "You are dead bitch," and every other insult you can imagine (country dependent because I've been in this situation in France, the US and Spain and each language has it's own preferred insults.)

Now, the thought occurs to me that the teenage male gamers I've seen see nothing wrong with saying horrible things to female players, because they are also saying horrible things to each other. It could be a weird form of awful equality - i.e. it's going to the lowest common teenage denominator regardless of gender.

If a male player is screaming "take it up the ass" to a male opponent it's not that much different than saying "suck my cock" to a female opponent.

I'm sure it feels different because women have to live in a culture of perpetual potential sexual assault in a way that most males don't - but I think that asking the average 15 year old Call Of Duty player to make that distinction might be fairly difficult. That said, if I was a 15 year old female player in that situation I'd probably just start calling the boys "fags" or "limp dicks" or whatever seemed to have the most effect.

Not that using sexuality or body types or whatever as insults is a good thing - just that it's a fairly normal teenage thing that doesn't really imply misogyny or homophobia it more implies that the person using those words has not yet developed empathy or the understanding of the emotional consequences of his or her words - which makes sense for that age group. They are using the words for shock value and to have a bit of a giggle because they know they are not supposed to use those words. Eventually most of them will grow up and not be like that.

It's sorta like how "that's what she said" is funny when you are 11, but less so when you are 18.

Date: 2011-02-17 12:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
But how would you do it on Xbox Live and keep XBox live a growing concern?

If you start banning any teenager who calls another teen a "fag" while playing some war game you are going to lose a huge part of your customer base.

Shit, I grew up in a very liberal household and never had any homophobia at all - but the shit my friends and I said to each other when we were 15 and playing Mortal Kombat and parents were not in the room would have been enough to get us banned from any semi public forum.

Teenagers say shitting things. Design something where your main profit base is going to come from allowing teenagers to anonymously say things and combine that with war games and you will get shitty things being said.

(Hell, while playing Black Ops last weekend I found myself screaming things at the North Vietnamese troops after the fifth or sixth time I had to reboot the level that I'd never say outside the context of playing a game. If I'd been on Xbox Live and there was a censor patrol I might have gotten banned.)

Date: 2011-02-17 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
I'm not an expert on Live, but I do use it a fair bit.

There are already options for picking a player's preferred play environment; I picked "recreation", other options include "underground", "family", and "pro" if I have the titles correct. Alas that doesn't seem to filter out the obnoxiousness in my experience.

There is the option to block individuals. You can also choose to block everyone except people on your Friends list, or to block everyone except those in the Party you've gathered. I most often play with "Friends and Team" enabled, so that I only hear people I've been teamed up with and those I've picked to be preferred teammates/opponents.

Xbox Live does tally the number of times players are muted, and does investigate if that number grows large. Halo: Reach goes a step further and auto-mutes players who break a certain threshold on that count.

There is, of course, always the option of reporting players who are being abusive... I wish more would do so, as then the enforcement team would have more to go on.

-- Steve thinks half the problem is that folks aren't letting XBL know about individual cases of abuse, and instead wait until later to grumble about it. It's the old problem that the cops probably won't show up unless someone calls 'em...

Date: 2011-02-17 01:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
The concept of what people who choose "Underground" are saying terrifies me.

Date: 2011-02-17 09:23 pm (UTC)
zz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zz
Not that I actually play online, but I mainly chose it because I didn't want any "family friendly" bullshit on my experience, and partly because it appealed to my loner/gothic/etc side. :>

Date: 2011-02-17 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
On the PC version of Blops, I don't think you can turn off the text chat or block individuals in that. I never turn on voice for online games, except with irl friends. Text is bad enough.

Regrettably, in-game abusive/harassing chat probably wouldn't get you into any kind of trouble on the PC outside of a full-blown court case for wide-ranging abuse and harassment, due to the lack of an XBL type infrastructure of rules.

You might get kicked from certain servers depending on the way the game is set up (Black Ops, for example, but not in MW2) but other than that, you're generally free to say what you like to whoever is using the same chat system (built into the game or TS or Ventrilo or that Mumble one or whatever it is)

Date: 2011-02-17 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
It occurs to me that I should just link to Stephen Toulouse's blog entry on the Book of Enforcement. It's a humourous look at what Stepto, who is in charge of Policy and Enforcement for Xbox Live, does for a living.

-- Steve nearly injured himself laughing while listening to the version recorded by Major Nelson.

Date: 2011-02-17 09:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
The article's femininist focus, as others have said, is actually misrepresenting the problem.

The problem isn't just an attitude towards women, it's an attitude towards everyone different from a supposed norm that isn't necessarily a norm any more. In one specific game of Black Ops, without even turning on voice chat, I saw homophobia, racism and religious bigotry of a kind that would even upset the people at work who casually use racist terms that are in regrettably common usage. Hilariously misguided religious bigotry, in actual fact, but that's beside the point.

There is a culture of casual offensiveness built around a lot of online games and online communities in general. The weird thing is that in a multiplayer game like Modern Warfare, MW2 or Black Ops, one of the factions is quite often an ethnic group that bigoted people are prejudiced against, but the offensiveness in-game isn't related to that. I've never seen people saying "Oh dammit, why do I have to be on the NVA side, I want to be an American because I hate [racist epithet here]!"

(actually that's a lie, I did see people talking about that online in 2003 or so when anti-Iraqi/generic foreign terrorist propaganda was at its height, and people complained about playing as the middle eastern faction in a couple of games, but I've not seen it since)

Basically people online are all morons. Although since I try to bait people into bigotry, I am probably a part of the problem.

Imagine that I linked that fairly well-known Penny Arcade strip about internet behaviour.

Date: 2011-02-17 09:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
Hilarious relevant quote from a forum - the poster didn't seem aware of the funny side regarding prohibited words in custom class names.

"Try to name a basic assault class "Assault" and you can't because it has "Ass" in it. How gay is that?"

Date: 2011-02-17 12:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buddleia.livejournal.com
Are you referring to the link about 'How Could They Not Have Known'? Because the important thing there is the difference, not the general level of interaction. A 15yo female player on Call of Duty might be alright with the juvenile abuse bandied around but probably gets constant harassment directed specifically at her on the level of 'SHOW ME YOUR TITS' 'WHERE DO YOU LIVE SO I CAN FUCK YOU' 'YOUR FAT AND NOONE WILL FUCK YOU CUNT'.

Date: 2011-02-17 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
Yes, having heard boys in Internet cafes playing these games I'm sure shit like that gets said by 15 year old fuckwits all the fucking time. But they also throw shit like that at each other - and they simply aren't grown up enough to understand the difference (I agree that there is a huge difference, because of the rape culture of our society, but at age 15 most kids, particularly most male kids don't understand that yet. They honestly don't see the difference between "you are a fucking faggot and no girl will ever blow you and " You are a fat bitch and no one will ever want to fuck your cunt."

Saying the absolute worst thing possible - to both males and females - is part of that culture. This is not an excuse for it, just an observation that it may be immaturity and not misogyny at work here. Age 15 is when kids are still telling dead baby jokes and AIDS jokes and such. They have yet to grow up enough to understand how much these "jokes" can hurt.

In short, 15 year old boys are assholes to girls but they are also assholes to boys.

Date: 2011-02-17 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buddleia.livejournal.com
Ehh, that's not quite what I mean. But I'm coming straight from the article, which is about something else, to be honest.

Date: 2011-02-17 02:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
Yeah the article is about the overall practice of misogyny and get into comment screening but does touch on the overall culture in electronic media.

I was trying to extrapolate out from that part of the article. As to comments being invisible because the get deleted by site admins, that's another story.

I am paid to monitor a bunch of web forms for gay fetish communities adn as you can imagine they attract trollasholes fairly often. My policy is to ban the user but leave the comments up just so people don't forget these attitudes are out there.

Date: 2011-02-17 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
I was working off this section of the post:

"the hilarious/disturbing messages that many female gamers receive while playing online games."

Date: 2011-02-17 01:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bugshaw.livejournal.com
And the average 15 year old does grow out of it. But there are loads of average 14 year olds just waiting to turn into 15 years olds and IT NEVER ENDS

Date: 2011-02-17 01:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
Very true.

This is another reason why I've never activated Xbox Live. I'm very well aware of what I would have done on XBox Live if it had existed when I was 15 and would really, really like to avoid immersion into that culture.

Luckily nobody will ever know the things I screamed at Sonja Blade back in the day when her character did a finishing move on my Raiden.

Date: 2011-02-17 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alextfish.livejournal.com
Is it just me who finds it distasteful that the example "female manner" for how a science topic could be presented is "how is a laser used in cosmetic surgery"...?

Date: 2011-02-17 05:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com
Nope. I think it's patronizing bullshit.

Date: 2011-02-17 09:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
Much of the fuss about MSG was always "HURRRR FURRINERS ARE DIFFERENT TO US AND THEIR FOOD IS POISON/DIRTY" racism dressed up as supposed common knowledge.

Date: 2011-02-25 08:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luckylove.livejournal.com
I was going to post something about MSG but I seem to recall posting something similar a while back and getting jumped on and I doubt I'd react well to being told I'm stupid (everyone knows it's nothing but racist bullshit) because I get migraines whenever someone accidentally uses the wrong stock cube.

April 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 2 34
567 8 9 10 11
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 12th, 2026 08:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios