Page Summary
simont - (no subject)
strawberryfrog.livejournal.com - (no subject)
marrog.livejournal.com - (no subject)
momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dalglir.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bracknellexile.livejournal.com - (no subject)
channelpenguin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dpolicar - (no subject)
matgb - (no subject)
d-c-m.livejournal.com - (no subject)
robhu.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 12-04-2026
- 2: Photo cross-post
- 3: Interesting Links for 10-04-2026
- 4: Interesting Links for 08-04-2026
- 5: Interesting Links for 09-04-2026
- 6: Photo cross-post
- 7: Life with two kids: magic numbers
- 8: Interesting Links for 31-03-2026
- 9: What books did Terry Pratchett find inspirational?
- 10: Interesting Links for 03-04-2026
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 11:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 11:20 am (UTC)The Bing toolbar (who runs that anyway?) tracks user clicks and feeds them back into later search Bing results. Because a link that a user actually follows as opposed to ignoring is good data as the the relevance of a link, i.e. what future users might also want to follow. So if someone clicks on page "AAAA" as a link for term "BBBB" then, in the carefully engineered absence of any other data for term "BBBB", this makes "AAAA" a good search result for it.
This data collection isn't really news, and the equivalent Google toolbar does the same. I'm not sure what Google's point is - that if they send data to Bing by running the toolbar and clicking on a link, Bing uses that data? Duh. That the google search results page is treated like any other page in this process?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 11:28 am (UTC)is flocked.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 11:50 am (UTC)http://sarthanapalos.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/a-guide-how-not-to-say-stupid-stuff-about-egypt/
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 11:43 am (UTC)Locked, even when I log into DW.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 12:35 pm (UTC)"Recent studies shows that mild-moderate swearing actually helps people relate more. If “ass” is offensive to you, I’d disconnect the internet now because it only gets worse. <.<"
lol
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 01:43 pm (UTC)The implication in the article above is that the apps are being rejected because you can't by content in-app, only from exterior sources and then view it on an iOS device. The implication in The Register's take on all this is that the apps are being rejected because they can access content not bought on an iOS device.
Both mean Apple don't get their 30% but there's a big difference in the implications. Either the app will be approved as long as you can buy elsewhere AND in the iOS app, or it'll be approved if you can ONLY view content that was bought in the iOS app, not bought from the same content-supplier elsewhere (non-iOS) online.
Anyone know which of these it is? Do Apple even know yet, I wonder.
If, for example, Microsoft turned round and said that iTunes running on Windows had to be restricted so that it could only play music bought via a PC, Apple would throw one hell of a hissy-fit and Microsoft would be ridiculed, yet Apple seem to keep getting away with this sort of thing time after time.
Never buying Apple.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 04:33 pm (UTC)I reckon at least 1/3 of the country is stressed or unhappy right now, which is 20 million people.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 05:44 pm (UTC)1 - completely dissatisfied 0.9%
2 - 2.1%
3 - 3.7%
4 - neutral 11.3%
5 - 20.7%
6 - 39.6%
7 - completely satisfied - 21.7%
Usual provisos on asking people stuff about themsleves even in a written questionnaire apply. But I think that since it's about feelings and thus by definition a subjective judgement that only the individual can make, then I don't see how else you do it!
See "Happiness" by David Lykken for the actual numbers and what they asked and a ton more good stuff on this.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-03 07:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 03:55 pm (UTC)If only I liked the taste of mussels.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-02 06:49 pm (UTC)FRAK you Apple!
Go Egypt. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-03 02:21 am (UTC)The bishops are pretty free to vote in a way that those from the major parties are not, and their intent is generally to vote 'morally' (defined as what they think is moral, but in reality apart from a very small % of issues we all probably agree with what the bishops think of as moral).
no subject
Date: 2011-02-03 07:54 am (UTC)More a matter of my ignorance than anything else, of course.