Page Summary
matgb - (no subject)
autopope.livejournal.com - (no subject)
drainboy.livejournal.com - •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
undeadbydawn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
skington.livejournal.com - (no subject)
d-c-m.livejournal.com - (no subject)
henriksdal.livejournal.com - (no subject)
octopoid-horror.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 04-09-2025
- 2: Interesting Links for 05-09-2025
- 3: Interesting Links for 03-09-2025
- 4: Interesting Links for 01-09-2025
- 5: Life with two kids: A matter of probability
- 6: Interesting Links for 29-08-2025
- 7: Interesting Links for 31-08-2025
- 8: Interesting Links for 26-08-2025
- 9: Interesting Links for 27-08-2025
- 10: Musical interlude with a room full of children
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 11:30 am (UTC)Amazon include free ebooks in their "sales" figures, and have most of Project Gutenberg online for Kindle. (When was the last time you went into a branch of Waterstones and they were giving away free books?)
The actual word I'm getting from my publishers are that sales of real for-money ebooks are up to around 8-9% by sales volume. Revenue lags slightly. But Amazon has 80% of the ebook market and around 10-20% of the physical book market, so of course Amazon has got a disproportionately high level of ebook sales, even before you take into account their desire to push the Kindle (because it cuts their fulfilment cost per purchase to near-zero while retaining the traditional high margin they get by extorting huge discounts off SRP from the publishers).
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 11:36 am (UTC)"Amazon announced that in the US since the start of the year it had sold 115 e-book downloads for every 100 paperback books, even excluding its downloads of free books."
I'm surprised Amazon only has 20% of the physical book market. I'd have thought it was higher than that, especially now B&N have collapsed.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 12:35 pm (UTC)With B&N dying it's not surprising that Amazon are growing larger.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-31 09:47 am (UTC)No, as in 'are included in Amazon's sale statistics for eBooks allegedly'.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-31 09:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 09:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 10:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 10:38 pm (UTC)But it was from an author who makes more money than anyone else, so rather an exception.
Amazon, in their advertising, are very much positioning themselves as an everything-you-want store rather than as a bookseller. I vaguely remember ads for amazon as a bookseller, but those days are long gone.
•Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 11:32 am (UTC)Re: •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 11:38 am (UTC)Re: •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 11:50 am (UTC)Given that the main battle for the female of the species is finding a partner that will stick around and use resources to raise their children, I guess having someone that might not even fancy your gender is possibly a higher risk proposition than someone that merely goes and impregnates someone else. That's an interesting statistic for me (presuming that the percentages vaguely relate to the benefits of keeping the cheating partner from an evolutionary perspective, which I suspect they will, even if only very vaguely).
I guess it's the fact that the article headline could be re-written to "men less jealous of cheating that doesn't result in raising someone else's kids" is what got me :)
(I'm not saying it's not worth doing, just in case the results are not in line with expectation)
Re: •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 11:58 am (UTC)You could equally well argue (if it had turned out the other way) that men were more willing to put up with partners who were likely to stay with them as they were sexually interested in their gender, but not with a woman who might leave with another one.
A lot of "evolutionary explanations" turn out to be incredibly culturally biased, because they assume that whatever behaviour is true in the researcher's culture is natural.
Re: •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 12:17 pm (UTC)But a man that might get you pregnant then leave you for another man so you have to bring up the child yourself: EVOLUTIONARY LOSE!
Given the gender roles in terms of who can and can't get pregnant there's no way I would have thought it could go the other way (not to say that's not worth testing, but I'd have bet the house on it)
Re: •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 12:18 pm (UTC)Re: •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 12:30 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionarily_stable_strategy
Re: •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 12:17 pm (UTC)Re: •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 12:32 pm (UTC)Re: •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 01:30 pm (UTC)Still not saying it's a slam-dunk or anything like, though.
Re: •Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Date: 2011-01-28 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 12:15 pm (UTC)Amazon is not the only book retailer on earth, even if they are the easiest [arguably] to track. When there are no bookshops or libraries left, I will agree the paperback is dead.
Does the US actually train their troops? Do they get *any* target practice? That figure - while believable - is utterly absurd. But hey, that's what happens when you have all the money in China and zero sense of accountability.
it is little surprise that our system of Democracy is not considered the best. I *am* surprised that US is ranked higher.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 11:29 pm (UTC)Or you could try actually reading the article (from 2005, which changes the context a lot) that is linked to, so you can make intelligent comments.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 03:21 am (UTC)Your criticism is no doubt completely valid.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-30 10:25 am (UTC)I mean look at the 'best country to live' one I saw the other day (I forget the link) like the that ranked countries on various factors and where the US No. 1 for health!! (spending was part of the equation, I think it must have go WAY too much weight....)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-30 11:21 am (UTC)http://www.democracybarometer.org/baroapp/public/static/index?lang=en
no subject
Date: 2011-01-30 11:20 am (UTC)http://www.democracybarometer.org/baroapp/public/static/index?lang=en
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 04:59 pm (UTC)I want.
*headesk* *embarrassment* *headdesk*
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh good grief. Talk about cultural hysteria.
I love your posts. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 06:34 pm (UTC)20 quid for a ziplock bag? (Which is what Bezos uses.)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 07:24 pm (UTC)I KNOW and it's really annoying
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 10:34 pm (UTC)Hell, look at what can happen to poor migrant workers in Britain!
The world is not all made of magic fairy dust. The cheap electronics, exotic ingredients in your food, the functional yet stylish clothes you like - people probably bled and worked to death or damn near it for those.
If you look closely enough at almost anything that's part of a western lifestyle, you're not going to like what you see. Go to a nice farmers' market on the weekend, and you're still running the risk of buying products that might have been picked by migrant workers who don't get anything like the minimum wage and sometimes things are worse but it's okay because it's organic and local.
Sadly, it comes down to a question of what you can choose to ignore, and what you can choose to live with. For many, buying fair trade "when you can" is enough to allay that guilty fear that someone pays for your lifestyle. It's like original sin, but for western capitalism.