andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2011-01-28 07:39 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
Amazon "stressed that sales of paperback books were also growing". Evidence of my death are greatly exaggerated.

Date: 2011-01-28 11:30 am (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
Wrt. Amazon and ebooks, I don't believe a word they say.

Amazon include free ebooks in their "sales" figures, and have most of Project Gutenberg online for Kindle. (When was the last time you went into a branch of Waterstones and they were giving away free books?)

The actual word I'm getting from my publishers are that sales of real for-money ebooks are up to around 8-9% by sales volume. Revenue lags slightly. But Amazon has 80% of the ebook market and around 10-20% of the physical book market, so of course Amazon has got a disproportionately high level of ebook sales, even before you take into account their desire to push the Kindle (because it cuts their fulfilment cost per purchase to near-zero while retaining the traditional high margin they get by extorting huge discounts off SRP from the publishers).
Edited Date: 2011-01-28 11:30 am (UTC)

Date: 2011-01-28 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] swisstone.livejournal.com
What can also be found in that article is that, whilst e-books are outselling paperbacks, paperback sales are also up. So, the increase in e-book sales is clearly not at the expense of physical book sales, and pronouncing the death of the physical book seems very premature.

Date: 2011-01-28 12:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] swisstone.livejournal.com
I still see no grounds for pronouncing the death of the physical book. That requires figures showing that sales of paperbacks overall have declined significantly.

Date: 2011-01-28 03:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
Another thing included according to someone's post I saw: daily newspapers.

Date: 2011-01-31 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
Sorry, bit unclear there.

No, as in 'are included in Amazon's sale statistics for eBooks allegedly'.

Date: 2011-01-29 09:16 am (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
In terms of book sales, Amazon are rather smaller than everyone seems to think. They punch above their weight in mindshare, but books aren't Amazon's real focus or profit centre -- they make much more money through sales of white goods -- and the real deal is their combined sales database (with third party online suppliers often forced to go through Amazon just because of said customer mind-share) and to a lesser extent their fulfilment system for those items they actually stock.

Date: 2011-01-28 10:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
Actually, they were giving away free books in the street outside waterstones the other weekend.

But it was from an author who makes more money than anyone else, so rather an exception.

Amazon, in their advertising, are very much positioning themselves as an everything-you-want store rather than as a bookseller. I vaguely remember ads for amazon as a bookseller, but those days are long gone.
From: [identity profile] drainboy.livejournal.com
In other breaking news: bears more likely to shit in woods, Pope more likely to wear silly hat and enable child molestors.
From: [identity profile] drainboy.livejournal.com
True, but if you simply follow the evolutionary logic of it, given that males of the species have a higher risk of ending up not having their genes passed on if their partner does things that results in pregnancy by someone else, then cheating with someone that can get them pregnant is a far worse crime than cheating with someone that can't.

Given that the main battle for the female of the species is finding a partner that will stick around and use resources to raise their children, I guess having someone that might not even fancy your gender is possibly a higher risk proposition than someone that merely goes and impregnates someone else. That's an interesting statistic for me (presuming that the percentages vaguely relate to the benefits of keeping the cheating partner from an evolutionary perspective, which I suspect they will, even if only very vaguely).

I guess it's the fact that the article headline could be re-written to "men less jealous of cheating that doesn't result in raising someone else's kids" is what got me :)
(I'm not saying it's not worth doing, just in case the results are not in line with expectation)
From: [identity profile] drainboy.livejournal.com
Even better if they leave once you've got them pregnant. Two women raising your children for you? EVOLUTIONARY WIN!

But a man that might get you pregnant then leave you for another man so you have to bring up the child yourself: EVOLUTIONARY LOSE!

Given the gender roles in terms of who can and can't get pregnant there's no way I would have thought it could go the other way (not to say that's not worth testing, but I'd have bet the house on it)
From: [identity profile] drainboy.livejournal.com
You could talk about it in terms of sociology or psychology or whatever you like. I'm merely thinking about it in terms of the benefits it passes onto your genes to have that strategy when dealing with those sorts of situations (and obviously humans can rise above that, as evolution is far from everything there is, especially when you know about it).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionarily_stable_strategy
From: [identity profile] cairmen.livejournal.com
It strikes me that when you consider the other finding in the article (women dump men who sleep with men more often than men who sleep with women), the evolutionary argument starts to gain strength here.

Still not saying it's a slam-dunk or anything like, though.

Date: 2011-01-28 12:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undeadbydawn.livejournal.com
Death of Books: Utter bollocks.
Amazon is not the only book retailer on earth, even if they are the easiest [arguably] to track. When there are no bookshops or libraries left, I will agree the paperback is dead.

Does the US actually train their troops? Do they get *any* target practice? That figure - while believable - is utterly absurd. But hey, that's what happens when you have all the money in China and zero sense of accountability.

it is little surprise that our system of Democracy is not considered the best. I *am* surprised that US is ranked higher.

Date: 2011-01-28 11:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] errolwi.livejournal.com
Does the US actually train their troops? Do they get *any* target practice? That figure - while believable - is utterly absurd. But hey, that's what happens when you have all the money in China and zero sense of accountability.

Or you could try actually reading the article (from 2005, which changes the context a lot) that is linked to, so you can make intelligent comments.

Date: 2011-01-29 03:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undeadbydawn.livejournal.com
That would be the sensible thing to do, but sometimes I prefer to just react in near total ignorance.

Your criticism is no doubt completely valid.

Date: 2011-01-28 12:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skington.livejournal.com
It's really annoying to just see an overall ranking of democracies, rather than the actual breakdown of individual countries' ranks on each subject. In particular, I'm surprised at Belgium's high ranking, given what a basket-case that country is.

Date: 2011-01-30 10:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
Yeah, I really wanted to see what the criteria actually were... did Imiss a link or something. It's really not much of an article without that list. The UK may score down. e.g. because we are subjects not citizens (despite that that makes approximately zero practical difference).

I mean look at the 'best country to live' one I saw the other day (I forget the link) like the that ranked countries on various factors and where the US No. 1 for health!! (spending was part of the equation, I think it must have go WAY too much weight....)

Date: 2011-01-28 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] d-c-m.livejournal.com
Waterproof cover for a Kindle. Now you can read it in the bath!
I want.

US forced to import bullets from Israel as troops use 250,000 for every rebel killed.
*headesk* *embarrassment* *headdesk*

Your Chocolate Is Made By Enslaved Kids. No, seriously.
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men
Oh good grief. Talk about cultural hysteria.

I love your posts. :)

Date: 2011-01-28 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snarlish.livejournal.com
"Waterproof cover for a Kindle. Now you can read it in the bath!"

20 quid for a ziplock bag? (Which is what Bezos uses.)

Date: 2011-01-28 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] henriksdal.livejournal.com
"Men more likely to stick with girlfriends who sleep with other women than other men"

I KNOW and it's really annoying

Date: 2011-01-28 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
Chiquita, you know, the banana company, gave money to paramilitary groups in Colombia. A lot of money.

Hell, look at what can happen to poor migrant workers in Britain!

The world is not all made of magic fairy dust. The cheap electronics, exotic ingredients in your food, the functional yet stylish clothes you like - people probably bled and worked to death or damn near it for those.

If you look closely enough at almost anything that's part of a western lifestyle, you're not going to like what you see. Go to a nice farmers' market on the weekend, and you're still running the risk of buying products that might have been picked by migrant workers who don't get anything like the minimum wage and sometimes things are worse but it's okay because it's organic and local.

Sadly, it comes down to a question of what you can choose to ignore, and what you can choose to live with. For many, buying fair trade "when you can" is enough to allay that guilty fear that someone pays for your lifestyle. It's like original sin, but for western capitalism.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 56
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 5th, 2025 06:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios