I like the flowchart and mostly rather agree with it beyond the fact that it's funny.
However, I think the main missing question in actually applying this is 'is my work/reputation good enough to be paid for'? This is normally where people fall down, particuarly in the current market. It's an unfortunate fact that sometimes you do need the portfolio/experience/connections.
I'm constantly debating in my head whether I am for or against government supported schemes to give internships/work experience to people who can't find work [in their sector], for companies who couldn't otherwise afford it.
Hmmm.
That was a mostly pointless comment. I'm a bit bored (working at a place where I am getting paid but for no discernible skill at all, itching to get home and do all my unpaid work...)
Yeah, short-term internships and work experience is something I can grit my teeth and cope with - particularly if the government is helping out with it. But it should be time limited, so that they aren't taking advantage of the skills you learn.
That light exposure study is people under bright lights late at night ('during usual hours of sleep') so more applicable to people working nightshifts than those of us who live in parts of the world where it goes dark at 3.30pm at mid winter. It would be interesting to see if artifical light between the hours of say 4 and 9 pm when it is dark outside would have the same effect though, especially given Scotland's poor health record.
I'm not sure the vote on grade for pregnant student article really is about feminism. Clearly the professor is showing poor judgement in getting his class to vote on the grade that she gets (although I must say we had something similar happen in one of my classes but it was for everyone), but is it because she's pregnant or because as stated she is unable to attend the appropriate tests? In other words, if she'd been in a car accident would he have sent the same email? If she'd been a he would he have sent the same email? If the answer is yes then it's not about feminism.
What I mostly think about this situation is that the university should have procedures in place for dealing with people who are unable to fulfil the course requirements for reasons which are not their fault. And that the professor should have sorted out a solution with the university, not by asking his students to vote.
In the case of my course for one module we had to do group presentations, and the lecturers decided that each group would get 50% (or 60%?) of their grade for the presentation assigned to them by another group (I think it was done at random but the group doing the scoring knew who they were).
There were no consequences for whatever you did, so naturally the groups talked to each other and agreed to all give one another maximum marks. This is exactly what you'd expect to happen, and there was no reason to think this wasn't allowed.
After a few weeks the lecturers cottoned on to what was happening and punished all the groups who had scored another group so far by giving them Ds or something.
About the only positive thing I can see coming out of making people pay for their degrees is that they might feel that the service they get isn't good enough, and demand better, and possibly have a legal right to it.
As you know I work in an academic institution, and so we get a lot of people from teaching academia come to work with us.
A former lecturer (from a prestigious university) joined a few days ago, and he said the big effect of tuition fees was that students expect you to actually teach them and they expect the teaching to be good now.
I got the impression he (or perhaps his colleagues) weren't very interested in teaching and just wanted to do research, so they saw this as a bit of a bad thing.
He was saying that the issue would become more acute as tuition fees go up to 6-9K.
Interestingly he also said that if the grades fall at all from one year to the next it is viewed as a failure of the lecturer, and that if anyone fails a module it is considered to be a failing of the lecturer (he implied it'd be investigated).
I remember when I was at university (the year before fees) we had a lecturer who was absolutely rubbish and practically all of us failed his module the one year (so of course they upped the grades of everyone to give us a better average). We'd complained bitterly all through the term to no affect, although I believe they took him off the module the following year. If we'd paid fees we'd have protested more, I'm sure.
The lecturer is still there at the university some 12 years later, because he's got some renown (and useful links) in the worldwide science community. I shudder to think about the education, or lack of it, he's giving to the students.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 12:26 pm (UTC)However, I think the main missing question in actually applying this is 'is my work/reputation good enough to be paid for'? This is normally where people fall down, particuarly in the current market. It's an unfortunate fact that sometimes you do need the portfolio/experience/connections.
I'm constantly debating in my head whether I am for or against government supported schemes to give internships/work experience to people who can't find work [in their sector], for companies who couldn't otherwise afford it.
Hmmm.
That was a mostly pointless comment. I'm a bit bored (working at a place where I am getting paid but for no discernible skill at all, itching to get home and do all my unpaid work...)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 12:46 pm (UTC)(And it wasn't pointless at all)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 07:09 pm (UTC)What I mostly think about this situation is that the university should have procedures in place for dealing with people who are unable to fulfil the course requirements for reasons which are not their fault. And that the professor should have sorted out a solution with the university, not by asking his students to vote.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 07:14 pm (UTC)In the case of my course for one module we had to do group presentations, and the lecturers decided that each group would get 50% (or 60%?) of their grade for the presentation assigned to them by another group (I think it was done at random but the group doing the scoring knew who they were).
There were no consequences for whatever you did, so naturally the groups talked to each other and agreed to all give one another maximum marks. This is exactly what you'd expect to happen, and there was no reason to think this wasn't allowed.
After a few weeks the lecturers cottoned on to what was happening and punished all the groups who had scored another group so far by giving them Ds or something.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 07:15 pm (UTC)Do people not think about the consequences of their actions at all?
If I was one of those groups I'd have been very tempted to get lawyers involved.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 07:23 pm (UTC)A former lecturer (from a prestigious university) joined a few days ago, and he said the big effect of tuition fees was that students expect you to actually teach them and they expect the teaching to be good now.
I got the impression he (or perhaps his colleagues) weren't very interested in teaching and just wanted to do research, so they saw this as a bit of a bad thing.
He was saying that the issue would become more acute as tuition fees go up to 6-9K.
Interestingly he also said that if the grades fall at all from one year to the next it is viewed as a failure of the lecturer, and that if anyone fails a module it is considered to be a failing of the lecturer (he implied it'd be investigated).
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 08:21 pm (UTC)The lecturer is still there at the university some 12 years later, because he's got some renown (and useful links) in the worldwide science community. I shudder to think about the education, or lack of it, he's giving to the students.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 11:51 pm (UTC)