Evidence-based policy
Jan. 5th, 2011 01:39 pmI posted a poll yesterday on LJ, and then one on DW asking if people would have voted there if it had been there.
Final tally (well, 24 hours later, so final enough): 101 on LJ, 13 on DW. Which settles that, so long as there isn't a way to do a poll in both at once I'll be posting polls on LJ (and a link on DW to them).
Final tally (well, 24 hours later, so final enough): 101 on LJ, 13 on DW. Which settles that, so long as there isn't a way to do a poll in both at once I'll be posting polls on LJ (and a link on DW to them).
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 02:26 pm (UTC)In my experience people don't follow links that much (and yes, I know that sounds odd as I'm largely a linkblog).
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-07 08:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-07 08:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-07 08:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-07 08:44 am (UTC)If other people want an ad-free service, then I'm glad they can view me on DW (where I also pay), but I'm not going to force people to switch.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-07 08:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-07 09:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-07 08:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-07 08:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-06 03:24 am (UTC)If you posted a poll on DW and linked to it from LJ, I would take the poll (assuming it's a poll I'd otherwise take). But then, sometimes I get around to polls a few days late anyway.
Maybe you should have a poll regarding how many LJ people would read you on DW if you didn't also post to LJ.