Date: 2010-11-14 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cairmen.livejournal.com
Loooooooooonies...

Date: 2010-11-14 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
I like crazy when the crazy is that crazy.

Date: 2010-11-14 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strawberryfrog.livejournal.com
Someone's trolling with "Why Do Non-Conservatives Exist?" but it's hard to tell who.

Date: 2010-11-14 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com
You think? I'm scared they're deadly deadly fucking serious.

Date: 2010-11-14 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ashfae.livejournal.com
I'm afraid they are. Sometimes I really don't miss my country.

Date: 2010-11-14 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strawberryfrog.livejournal.com
Poe's law says that there's an even chance that you're right. But to me it just reads like 4chan has been in there, and the more subtle trolling hasn't been detected and reverted.

Date: 2010-11-14 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com
It'll be a bundle of fibre optic cables, so it's very upgradeable.

Date: 2010-11-14 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dalglir.livejournal.com
It's certainly a major investment but a 100Gb backbone connection isn't _especially_ big between two large and geographically close (on a global scale) cities.

If they're bundling, say, OC-768/STM-256 lines then 100Gb shouldn't too hard to reach. Not really sure why it's news :)

Date: 2010-11-14 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pete stevens (from livejournal.com)
Isn't it 100G on a single wavelength, so one 100G interface rather than 10x10G or 3x40G ? Using DWDM and 64 wavelengths it'd be upping the capacity per fibre from 640Gbps (10Gbps) or 2.5Tbs (40Gbs) to 6.4Gbps. Janet already runs 40Gbps per transceiver on the main backbone around the UK.

Date: 2010-11-15 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dalglir.livejournal.com
Yes - that's along the lines of what I was thinking. OC-768/STM 256 connections are ~40Gb each.

EDIT: I will learn to read things properly instead of just glancing through LJ while I'm working :)

It seemed more insinuated that this is 100Gb on a single line terminating on a single interface. If they've cracked it (which seems backed up by Andy's further link below): well done. If they can apply the technology to existing, laid fibre then that's a good leap forward.

Edited Date: 2010-11-15 10:42 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-11-15 10:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dalglir.livejournal.com
Does seem to suggest that it's a 100G Ethernet terminating on a single physical interface.


March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 15th, 2026 08:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios