Page Summary
lizzie-and-ari.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hirez.livejournal.com - (no subject)
anton-p-nym.livejournal.com - (no subject)
andrewhickey.livejournal.com - (no subject)
a-pawson.livejournal.com - (no subject)
heyokish.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
meaningrequired.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kashandara.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lpetrazickis.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eatsoylentgreen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
draconid.livejournal.com - (no subject)
octopoid-horror.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nickys.livejournal.com - (no subject)
soon_lee - (no subject)
bohemiancoast.livejournal.com - (no subject)
e-halmac.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lilaanne.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 12-04-2026
- 2: Photo cross-post
- 3: Interesting Links for 10-04-2026
- 4: Interesting Links for 08-04-2026
- 5: Interesting Links for 09-04-2026
- 6: Photo cross-post
- 7: Life with two kids: magic numbers
- 8: Interesting Links for 31-03-2026
- 9: What books did Terry Pratchett find inspirational?
- 10: Interesting Links for 03-04-2026
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 12:01 pm (UTC)-- Steve is reminded to drop off more change, as his last pocket-load didn't have very much.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 12:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 06:48 pm (UTC)http://www.ppu.org.uk/poppy/
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 05:36 pm (UTC)And fact is, I think they support themselves just fine, after all, they have rifles. And I'm not sure they support me.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 06:14 pm (UTC)I'd never seen/heard of the white ones before. If I ever see them, I think I'd buy them in preference.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 07:01 pm (UTC)Q:Do proceeds from sales of red & white poppies in Scotland (the UK) benefit the same institution? Reason I ask is because it wasn't the case in New Zealand which caused an uproar.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 08:12 pm (UTC)White poppy proceeds are distributed amongst a range of groups supposedly with the aim of educating for peace and petitioning for the reduction in the arms trade etc. It is impossibel to get a definitive list of causes, as by their pown admission, the Peace Pledge Union only list 'some' of these on their website. As recently as 2005, one of the causes they supported was the Socialist Worker's Party.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 08:31 pm (UTC)But the hijacking aspect disturbs me as (Red) Poppy Day is a big part of the RSA's annual fundraising.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 08:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 09:08 am (UTC)The other element is 'derailing' - trying to rewrite the argument on your own terms. The white poppy is a good example of this, because by making it a poppy, and then changing it to be white, the clear implication is that the red poppy is red to glorify war. Which is dishonest and insulting; the red poppy is red because poppies are red. If for some reason daffodils had grown in Flanders fields we'd be wearing little yellow flowers instead. The white poppy is a counter-argument to a position that does not exist, and by pretending that position does exist it insults and demeans poppy-wearers.
(For what it's worth, I am equally offended by any effort to impose poppy-wearing on people.)
no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 08:06 am (UTC)The poppies are made in Edinburgh by ex-servicemen - they have four leaves instead of two, and no leaf.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 08:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-13 11:02 am (UTC)