Sequel!

[andrewducker]

via chris_walsh

Comments

I may be overthinking this.

[hfnuala.livejournal.com]

It's not as good. I think because the first film was sexy man plus things women are supposed to be interested in, whereas this is more like sexy man plus things 'the media' want us to believe women find sexy when men do them. Actually, writing it out it's a passive versus active thing. In the first ad he was passive 'I'm on a horse!' this time he's actually doing stuff. I wonder did the writer/director change between the shoots?

Re: I may be overthinking this.

[andrewducker]

It didn't work as well for me because it was somewhat of a retread - it still worked to a certain extent because was expecting to be surprised. I think there's probably a limit to how many times they can do versions of this ad before they have him jumping a shark...

[henriksdal.livejournal.com]

have you seen the adverts with the shouty pec guy? They're insane!

[andrewducker]

Link?

[henriksdal.livejournal.com]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG0VGbcMeNM&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Q2OlqsknXI&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tI4CbCniBI&feature=channel

etc.

EXPLOSIIIIOOOOONNNNNNNS!

[andrewducker]

Wow. That truly is insane. I applaud their marketing geniuses.

[moniqueleigh]

Meh. I prefer the first one. The transitions aren't nearly as smooth in this version.

[d-c-m.livejournal.com]

OMG that is BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!