Disgusted of Edinburgh writes.

[andrewducker]

If you want to know why I wouldn't vote Conservative if you paid me, this is why.

Comments

[pete stevens (from livejournal.com)]

The point of a secret ballot is that you can't be paid to vote conservative, or labour, or monster raving looney because you can't provide a receipt to the paymaster to prove you did so.

Moving to the article in question, Shelter list them as 211th out of 323 councils.

http://housingleaguetable.org.uk/Hammersmith_and_Fulham

Noticeably higher up than my libdem council in Cambridge (242nd).

I'd note that Shelter are not a notorious bunch of Tory stooges.


The argument from the other side is here,

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/localgovernment/2009/02/how-and-why-ham.html

Which leads us to learn that, they cut council tax (which disproportionately benefits the poor as the Lib Dems will tell you ad inifinitum), they increased the schools, parks and policing budgets, they've cut the councils debt. All of these are not obviously bad results. Of course there's no mention of if the increased funding improved the situation.

http://www.met.police.uk/crimefigures/boroughs/fh_month%20-%20mps.htm

Leads us to believe that the crime rate in the area is falling (although possibly not statistically significantly).


So it's obvious Johann is being very selective in his reporting to try and persuade you to vote not Tory. What I can't evaluate is how selective he's being.

[andrewducker]

Cheers for the info.