It's all about the ducts
Mar. 19th, 2010 02:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've been wondering why, exactly, Edinburgh's Tram system is taking so ridiculously long to to get finished. I mean, I'm sure there's incompetence in a variety of places, but I was assuming that something material had occurred to throw work off so badly.
And in a throwaway comment in an article today in The Scotsman it becomes a bit clearer:
And in a throwaway comment in an article today in The Scotsman it becomes a bit clearer:
Figures set to be presented to the city's tram sub-committee next week show that contractor Carillion moved 40,000 metres of pipes and ducts when it was originally due to be paid £40 million to divert just 27,000m.While I'm sceptical about the second sentence there, I'm shocked that there was 50% more "stuff" down there than was expected. Was this because the utility companies had no idea what was actually down there? Was there just insufficient due diligence performed when calculating the amount of work to be done? I'd love to know who fucked up on this one - and whether it was actually avoidable.
According to the council, the amount of utilities work carried out has led to a "significant" improvement in the quality of the city's infrastructure and should help provide faster broadband internet.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 03:54 pm (UTC)It is as likely as not that the 'extra work' was extremely convenient and saved buckets of trouble/future efforts.
we have no idea what's down there.
Elsewhere, consider that a few centuries ago the Old Town was physically elevated tens of feet, so the ground floors became two underground. People still tried to live there, literally swamped in piss, shit and corpses. Fancy a dig?
It's a shame I'm a useless writer as I've been trying to throw out some horror fiction based on little details like that.
fascinating.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 03:59 pm (UTC)So no, probably not avoidable.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 08:56 pm (UTC)I presume that the relocation teams are making better records of precisely where the new stuff is being relaid for future reference.
The reason they had to move all this stuff was because if they just laid the tram tracks over the top of the existing underground services then the whole tram system would grind to a halt the next time a water pipe burst or a gas feed ruptured and they dug up the track area to repair it. Unlike buses trams can't drive around the traffic cones and diggers and men leaning on shovels when this happens.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 10:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-19 09:50 pm (UTC)