Page Summary
andrewducker - (no subject)
cheekbones3.livejournal.com - (no subject)
skington.livejournal.com - (no subject)
laserboy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
the-gardener.livejournal.com - (no subject)
random-redhead.livejournal.com - (no subject)
loveandgarbage.livejournal.com - (no subject)
daisyflip.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 10-03-2026
- 2: Life with two children: Gideon updates
- 3: Photo cross-post
- 4: Interesting Links for 14-03-2026
- 5: Interesting Links for 13-03-2026
- 6: I need to know when it's okay to tell your partner you love them
- 7: Interesting Links for 11-03-2026
- 8: Interesting Links for 12-03-2026
- 9: Links Extra: More data than you ever wanted.
- 10: Interesting Links for 09-03-2026
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 01:30 am (UTC)The girl comment also puts paid to the 'excuse' for not ever having a female doctor being that the Time Lords don't change sex between regenerations and that's why he's always male.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 12:30 pm (UTC)Although yes, he did sound a little horrified at the prospect that he might be a girl.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 06:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-16 03:14 pm (UTC)And slow to write back.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-16 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 03:25 am (UTC)And/or he might be freaked out by crashing.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 04:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 08:01 am (UTC)Totally throwaway.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 08:51 am (UTC)Actually, now that you mention it, doesn't his reaction establish (for the first time?) that regeneration is mysterious enough that regenerating into a woman is a possibility? If it was an absolute biological fact that men regenerate into men, the alternate possibility wouldn't have crossed his mind.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:21 am (UTC)Tom Baker came out with:
"If the sum of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the square on the other two sides, why is a mouse when it spins?"
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 11:29 am (UTC)It can't be random: the chance of 9 successive regenerations all being male (given that the first incarnation was) is one in 500. Perhaps changing sex on regeneration is like having identical twins: rare and rather a surprise but by no means so unusual that you can't believe it.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:27 am (UTC)Personally I'm far more annoyed by the way everyone got paired off in the epilogue and particularly by Martha being credited as 'Martha Smith-Jones' (although I will stop being annoyed by this if someone tells me that Mickey was also credited as 'Smith-Jones' - I wasn't really watching the credits).
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 10:01 am (UTC)Do we know how Moffat is for 'having a clue' when it comes to stereotyping?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 10:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 10:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 01:14 pm (UTC)But that's not likely now. Not for any misogynistic reasons, but because the Doctor is now as much a British cultural icon as (say) Robin Hood and Sherlock Holmes. Ergo, he's now fixed as forever male.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 05:14 pm (UTC)