Date: 2009-11-01 04:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
Ghostly sex: it depends on whether there was an exchange of ectoplasm. If not, then it doesn't meet the Clinton definition of sexual relations.

Date: 2009-11-01 04:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pisica.livejournal.com
But you'd have to say 'that ghost' instead of 'that woman'.

I'm marking essays. This poll is a welcome distraction.

Date: 2009-11-01 04:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizzie-and-ari.livejournal.com
Well... There's a bit of a semantic problem with that last question; yes, I can't believe I actually took part in this poll and no, I can't believe I actually took part in this poll meaning the same thing.

I took yes to mean 'I agree with this statement' and no to mean 'I disagree with this statement'. Hence 'no'. Seems like a reasonable use of my time to me :)

Date: 2009-11-01 05:41 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-11-01 07:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mindwanders.livejournal.com
Considering the number of people that consider sex with ghosts to be within the bounds of their relationship, I think we need another poll to see how people feel about other forms of undead and just plain corpses.

Enquiring minds need to know :-)

Date: 2009-11-02 02:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com
I think there should be a seperate poll asking how many people who were going to say boo to the fried eggs were put off answering when the ghost sex came up...

Date: 2009-11-03 04:52 pm (UTC)
ext_116401: (Analyse)
From: [identity profile] avatar.livejournal.com
Is that last question "yes I can't believe it" or "yes I can believe it" or ??

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 16th, 2026 08:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios