andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker
Can anyone explain to me, in nice simple English, why we shouldn't be extraditing a convicted hacker to the country where he commited the crime?  It really does seem like an open and shut case to me, and I'm baffled why some people seem to think it's wrong.

I'm clearly missing something - can someone explain it to me?

Date: 2009-07-31 10:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-gardener.livejournal.com
a convicted hacker

He has not yet been convicted, because he has not yet been tried.

Date: 2009-07-31 10:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
He has not been convicted, but has publically admitted he did carry out the crimes.

November 2025

S M T W T F S
       1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Nov. 27th, 2025 10:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios