andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2009-07-16 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
I have no real problems with the CRB checks (apart from the sheer number of errors in the database - ~12,000 complaints upheld in the 5 years to the end of 2008). I'd be more worried about the Enhanced-CRB which includes "soft intelligence". Basically if a kid steps up and says, "Sir touched me!", that teacher's career could be over, no matter how unsubstantiated or unproven the allegation.

That's fundamentally flawed IMHO, as per the case of John Pinnington from August 2008.

Date: 2009-07-16 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
If you believe it's 'innocent until proven guilty', why are there checks?

Date: 2009-07-16 01:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
Ethically it's a bit of a minefield. Clearly anyone who holds to the general principle of "innocent until proven guilty" has to make some form of exception in order to satisfy the competing ethic of "don't let children be harmed".

Pragmatically if we knew how many potential child abusers managed to gain jobs in care then we'd be better placed to know if this clash of ethics is worth resolving with CR checks.

Date: 2009-07-16 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
Nicely put. I've been enjoying a bunch of your comments recently.

I work in a charity, and I look at how much money we have to spend doing background checks. And how we can't take on *any* short term volunteers because not only would we not see a return on paying for a check, but the whole process can take months.

And it's not like we had a referendum or reasoned public debate. We just have had an explosion of agencies and quangos and bureaucracy responding to the 90s paedo panic.

Date: 2009-07-16 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
I actually work at the minute researching child protection decisions made by sexual health practitioners. Various ethical things tend to come up! My favourite one is currently the tension between patient confidentiality and the need to disclose suspicions of abuse. Particularly given that there tends to be a swing between preserving the family and taking children deemed at risk into care as soon as...(After Baby P and simialar cases we are heading towards the latter at pace I fear)

Date: 2009-07-16 02:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
Interesting. Anything you're likely to blog about, or should we look for an academic paper in the future...? =)

Date: 2009-07-16 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
There will be a paper, next year I would imagine. Being a little new to this game I'm not sure how long the publication timetable takes.

I'm unsure what the NHS status is on blogging about research projects so to stick on the safe side I probably won't do anything about it over on ye olde blog... (andyourelectronmicroscope.wordpress.com)

I might do something on decision making and risk assessment though... Given I have a shed load of references for that...

Date: 2009-07-16 01:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
Why is there an assumption the person needs checking?

Date: 2009-07-16 01:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
Or to put it another way, I worked in a financial department of a large, governmental organisation. There were no background checks to see if I tended to nick things.

Date: 2009-07-16 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
Well they took it on trust that you would tell them. I doubt many, if any, employer (outside of certain occupations) actually bothers to check.

Date: 2009-07-16 02:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
That's different to being checked. I didn't have to pay anyone to prove to the world I was honest.

Date: 2009-07-16 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
in my experience, they do. I've had all sorts of checks run on me by various investment banks. They pay.

Date: 2009-07-17 01:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
From The Reg:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/17/crb_enhanced_vetting_trouble/comments/

"I help run a childrens drama group and we will need to spend ~£640 to get our adult helpers registered under the new scheme, where will we get the money from?"

Date: 2009-07-16 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
I'm surprised. I work in a large, governmental organisation and I had to undergo many background checks.

Date: 2009-07-16 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
You are checking the list to see if someone is on it, in case they are a child abuser, ergo there must be an assumption (or if not an assumption a mechanism of sorts) that they might be guilty.

While not an assumption of guilt it doesn't sit entirely comfortably with the principle of assumption of innocence.

Date: 2009-07-16 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
How about if you had to deposit 50 quid on the way in?

Date: 2009-07-16 02:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
That is a good point, the only difference I would state is that the detectors are an essentially passive means of catching shoplifters out. They don't intrude on anyone elses personal lifes a CRB check is conciously carried out, it's not passive and it is (to an extent) invasive.

To be a little reducto ad absurdum (sp?) you could also state that doors (at least locked ones) also indicate the lack of an assumption of innocence. It also allows me to ask when is a door not a door?

When it's turning in to a field!

I have no real issue with CRB checks (I might if it was shown that they don't do all that much in real terms) however I do acknowledge that it's a touch "iffy" when it regards some of my socially liberal views and ethical standpoints. Certainly not enough for me to believe I have some arbitary cut off for where the presumption of innocence no longer matters but enough to make me a touch uncomfortable if I think about the competing ethics of it all.

Your mileage may differ of course.

Date: 2009-07-16 02:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
I suspect that if probationary services were better this wouldn't actually be needed. It's never gonna catch first time offenders afterall.

Although that brings up another ethical dilemma should "certain people" be watched by the state to protect the rest of us.

Like I said minefield ;)

(I'll have a looksee at some point to see if there is any data on this)

Date: 2009-07-16 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
A CRB check isn't exactly invasive. Your prospective employer rights off to the relevent agency, and gets a letter back saying yay or nay.

The only ways I can see it may be considered invasive are 1) you have to sign the form to give consent, and 2) it may delay you starting work while it is carried out.

Date: 2009-07-16 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
It's more invasive then security detectors at HMV anyway! ;)

I count acess to personal data about me to be reasonably invasive, giving consent obviously takes the edge off quite a fair bit, that said I would consider (as a non-criminal record type person) that any data they held about me would also be invasive.

It's a bitch waiting for clearance.

Date: 2009-07-16 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
I think we have different attitudes to personal data storage. I couldn't care less if my name sits on a database somewhere saying I have no criminal convictions.

The waiting time I can imagine is a problem, but hopefully efforts are being made to speed up the process.

Date: 2009-07-16 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
I don't think there is such an assumption. In fact the assumption is probably that the person is OK from initial interviews etc.

However, the reasoning is that the repercussions of allowing someone through, who is on the register, are so great that not checking everyone becomes a risk the organisation cannot take.

Date: 2009-07-16 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] red-phil.livejournal.com
Because of the occasional 'He was proven guilty and nobody noticed until afterwards he did it again....'

The myth of chemical cure.

Date: 2009-07-16 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
While I believe that drug treatment for many, many mental illnesses is sometimes a lottery, prescription being more of an art then a science, and also have much love for the social model of mental illness... I was gonna use the magic bullet analogy but I see it is used in the article!

I have to say the altered state thing grates a little, its reliant on the "diamond mind" metaphor - I.E. that the brain/personality/whatever is somehow rigid and has a baseline state of sorts. Not that it's subject to frequent change (on a biological level at least, although I would argue that conciousness possibly exists to create certain perceptual illusions that make us believe in a constant "us" - although I have nothing to back that up whatsoever so it's probably just be a random flight of fancy) at least in terms of emotional states.

To try and make the point I'm waffling around everytime we experience an emotion it's an "altered state", everytime we learn something new it pushes something old out of our heads it's an "altered state". To make the arbitary point that drugs alter brain chemistry thus produce an altered state is to my mind, if not an example of, bordering on the naturalistic fallacy.

Although that said I agree with the need for articles like this, despite quibbling over what probably appears to most people to be the minutae, if only to try and address the notion held by the public of mental illness.

Re: The myth of chemical cure.

Date: 2009-07-16 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
I agree that psychiatric drugs can be a "sticking plaster" for mental health problems. I just think that the "altered state" analogy is a bit pants really.

Date: 2009-07-16 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joexnz.livejournal.com
wait, wolverines the loner and Ironman is the play boy, in theory, though this map throws that toatally on its head
-smirk-

seriously though, i should actually sit down and work my through the x-men universe, though i don't suppose there is a box set

Date: 2009-07-16 11:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] red-phil.livejournal.com
*Smirk*
When you say work your way through the x-man universe, I don't think you mean reading the comics.

Date: 2009-07-17 07:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joexnz.livejournal.com
Sadly I was, but you're right that would be far more fun!!!

Date: 2009-07-17 05:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] d-c-m.livejournal.com
Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters
From the people that brought you Pride And Prejudice and Zombies...

I can't wait to read it!! Though I did like PPZ because the Bennett daughters kicked so much backside. So I'll be disappointed if this new book doesn't have the heroine doing something fun with a pistol.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 3rd, 2025 05:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios